generic-library/openssl
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

That statement seems to be not true. In fact, I have said that I would

Browse Source 
like to use libtool, but not automake.

Let's investigate that further, or leave the question open for now.
This commit is contained in:
Ulf Möller 2001-02-23 18:22:58 +00:00
parent ba93fd6a38
commit 6767a53669
1 changed files with 0 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
FAQ
View File

@ -119,11 +119,6 @@ A number of Linux and *BSD distributions include OpenSSL.
autoconf will probably be used in future OpenSSL versions. If it was autoconf will probably be used in future OpenSSL versions. If it was
less Unix-centric, it might have been used much earlier. less Unix-centric, it might have been used much earlier.
libtool has repeatadly been reported by some members of the OpenSSL
development and others to be a pain to use. So far, those in the
development team who have said anything about this have expressed
a wish to avoid libtool for that reason.
[LEGAL] ======================================================================= [LEGAL] =======================================================================