autoconf would be useful...
This commit is contained in:
parent
d7c06e9ec7
commit
ba93fd6a38
8
FAQ
8
FAQ
@ -116,12 +116,8 @@ A number of Linux and *BSD distributions include OpenSSL.
|
||||
|
||||
* Why aren't tools like 'autoconf' and 'libtool' used?
|
||||
|
||||
autoconf is a nice tool, but is unfortunately very Unix-centric.
|
||||
Although one can come up with solution to have ports keep in track,
|
||||
there's also some work needed for that, and can be quite painful at
|
||||
times. If there was a 'autoconf'-like tool that generated perl
|
||||
scripts or something similarly general, it would probably be used
|
||||
in OpenSSL much earlier.
|
||||
autoconf will probably be used in future OpenSSL versions. If it was
|
||||
less Unix-centric, it might have been used much earlier.
|
||||
|
||||
libtool has repeatadly been reported by some members of the OpenSSL
|
||||
development and others to be a pain to use. So far, those in the
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user