cab0ecdf190f9ff0282723aee903aab2d1d0e857

fb8478eb7b
) in HaarEvaluator::setImage(...) since it won't be recomputed by HaarEvaluator::computeOptFeatures() for cases where the input image dimensions and requested search scales are the same as the previous. If none of the above change then it should be correct, and if they do change it will be computed correctly inside HaarEvaluator::computeOptFeatures() (in commit 952f9dbe62
)
I'm guessing there is a unit test for this that needs to be called 2x with the same image and search parameters (or another image with the same size) to illustrate the problem.
Avoid clearing HaarEvaluator::tofs variable (introduced
fb8478eb7b
) in HaarEvaluator::setImage(...) since it won't be recomputed by HaarEvaluator::computeOptFeatures() for cases where the input image dimensions and requested search scales are the same as the previous. If none of the above change then it should be correct, and if they do change it will be computed correctly inside HaarEvaluator::computeOptFeatures() (in commit 952f9dbe62
)
OpenCV: Open Source Computer Vision Library
Resources
- Homepage: http://opencv.org
- Docs: http://docs.opencv.org
- Q&A forum: http://answers.opencv.org
- Issue tracking: http://code.opencv.org
Contributing
Please read before starting work on a pull request: http://code.opencv.org/projects/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute
Summary of guidelines:
- One pull request per issue;
- Choose the right base branch;
- Include tests and documentation;
- Clean up "oops" commits before submitting;
- Follow the coding style guide.
Description
Languages
C++
83.4%
Cuda
5.9%
C
3.8%
Java
2.4%
CMake
2.2%
Other
2.1%