Googletest export
Disable warnings on code that intentionally tests a suboptimal syntax PiperOrigin-RevId: 337138442
This commit is contained in:
parent
7e7e94429d
commit
f3dbe3ec44
@ -298,6 +298,13 @@ TEST(ExitStatusPredicateTest, KilledBySignal) {
|
||||
|
||||
# endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS || GTEST_OS_FUCHSIA
|
||||
|
||||
// The following code intentionally tests a suboptimal syntax.
|
||||
#ifdef __GNUC__
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdangling-else"
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wempty-body"
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wpragmas"
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
// Tests that the death test macros expand to code which may or may not
|
||||
// be followed by operator<<, and that in either case the complete text
|
||||
// comprises only a single C++ statement.
|
||||
@ -321,6 +328,9 @@ TEST_F(TestForDeathTest, SingleStatement) {
|
||||
else
|
||||
EXPECT_DEATH(_exit(1), "") << 1 << 2 << 3;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#ifdef __GNUC__
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
# if GTEST_USES_PCRE
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1468,6 +1478,13 @@ TEST(ConditionalDeathMacrosTest, AssertDeatDoesNotReturnhIfUnsupported) {
|
||||
|
||||
namespace {
|
||||
|
||||
// The following code intentionally tests a suboptimal syntax.
|
||||
#ifdef __GNUC__
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdangling-else"
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wempty-body"
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wpragmas"
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
// Tests that the death test macros expand to code which may or may not
|
||||
// be followed by operator<<, and that in either case the complete text
|
||||
// comprises only a single C++ statement.
|
||||
@ -1493,6 +1510,9 @@ TEST(ConditionalDeathMacrosSyntaxDeathTest, SingleStatement) {
|
||||
else
|
||||
EXPECT_DEATH_IF_SUPPORTED(_exit(1), "") << 1 << 2 << 3;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#ifdef __GNUC__
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests that conditional death test macros expand to code which interacts
|
||||
// well with switch statements.
|
||||
|
@ -201,6 +201,13 @@ TEST(ImplicitCastTest, CanUseImplicitConstructor) {
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(converted);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The following code intentionally tests a suboptimal syntax.
|
||||
#ifdef __GNUC__
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdangling-else"
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wempty-body"
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wpragmas"
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
TEST(GtestCheckSyntaxTest, BehavesLikeASingleStatement) {
|
||||
if (AlwaysFalse())
|
||||
GTEST_CHECK_(false) << "This should never be executed; "
|
||||
@ -216,6 +223,9 @@ TEST(GtestCheckSyntaxTest, BehavesLikeASingleStatement) {
|
||||
else
|
||||
GTEST_CHECK_(true) << "";
|
||||
}
|
||||
#ifdef __GNUC__
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(GtestCheckSyntaxTest, WorksWithSwitch) {
|
||||
switch (0) {
|
||||
|
@ -4131,11 +4131,13 @@ TEST(HRESULTAssertionTest, Streaming) {
|
||||
|
||||
#endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef __BORLANDC__
|
||||
// Silences warnings: "Condition is always true", "Unreachable code"
|
||||
# pragma option push -w-ccc -w-rch
|
||||
// The following code intentionally tests a suboptimal syntax.
|
||||
#ifdef __GNUC__
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdangling-else"
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wempty-body"
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wpragmas"
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests that the assertion macros behave like single statements.
|
||||
TEST(AssertionSyntaxTest, BasicAssertionsBehavesLikeSingleStatement) {
|
||||
if (AlwaysFalse())
|
||||
@ -4155,6 +4157,9 @@ TEST(AssertionSyntaxTest, BasicAssertionsBehavesLikeSingleStatement) {
|
||||
else
|
||||
EXPECT_GT(3, 2) << "";
|
||||
}
|
||||
#ifdef __GNUC__
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
|
||||
// Tests that the compiler will not complain about unreachable code in the
|
||||
@ -4175,6 +4180,13 @@ TEST(ExpectThrowTest, DoesNotGenerateDuplicateCatchClauseWarning) {
|
||||
EXPECT_THROW(throw std::exception(), std::exception);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The following code intentionally tests a suboptimal syntax.
|
||||
#ifdef __GNUC__
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdangling-else"
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wempty-body"
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wpragmas"
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
TEST(AssertionSyntaxTest, ExceptionAssertionsBehavesLikeSingleStatement) {
|
||||
if (AlwaysFalse())
|
||||
EXPECT_THROW(ThrowNothing(), bool);
|
||||
@ -4200,8 +4212,19 @@ TEST(AssertionSyntaxTest, ExceptionAssertionsBehavesLikeSingleStatement) {
|
||||
else
|
||||
; // NOLINT
|
||||
}
|
||||
#ifdef __GNUC__
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
// The following code intentionally tests a suboptimal syntax.
|
||||
#ifdef __GNUC__
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdangling-else"
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wempty-body"
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wpragmas"
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
TEST(AssertionSyntaxTest, NoFatalFailureAssertionsBehavesLikeSingleStatement) {
|
||||
if (AlwaysFalse())
|
||||
EXPECT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(FAIL()) << "This should never be executed. "
|
||||
@ -4224,6 +4247,9 @@ TEST(AssertionSyntaxTest, NoFatalFailureAssertionsBehavesLikeSingleStatement) {
|
||||
else
|
||||
ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED());
|
||||
}
|
||||
#ifdef __GNUC__
|
||||
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests that the assertion macros work well with switch statements.
|
||||
TEST(AssertionSyntaxTest, WorksWithSwitch) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user