Ministry of English Composition edits
Originally committed as revision 11597 to svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk
This commit is contained in:
parent
5e123bd359
commit
ac59e7f4b1
@ -28,16 +28,17 @@ NOTE: If you still don't understand some function, ask at our mailing list!!!
|
||||
(http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
What speedup justifies an optimizetion?
|
||||
---------------------------------------
|
||||
Normaly with clean&simple optimizations and widely used codecs a overall
|
||||
speedup of the affected codec of 0.1% is enough. These speedups accumulate
|
||||
and can make a big difference after a while ...
|
||||
Also if none of the following gets worse and at least one gets better then an
|
||||
optimization is always a good idea even if the overall gain is less than 0.1%
|
||||
(speed, binary code size, source size, source readability)
|
||||
For obscure codecs noone uses, the goal is more toward keeping the code clean
|
||||
small and readable than to make it 1% faster.
|
||||
When is an optimization justified?
|
||||
----------------------------------
|
||||
Normally, clean & simple optimizations on widely used codecs can achieve
|
||||
an overall speedup of 0.1%. These speedups accumulate and can make a big
|
||||
difference after awhile. Also, if none of the following factors get
|
||||
worse due to an optimization -- speed, binary code size, source size,
|
||||
source readability -- and at least one factor improves, then an
|
||||
optimization is always a good idea even if the overall gain is less than
|
||||
0.1%. For obscure codecs that are not often used, the goal is more
|
||||
toward keeping the code clean, small, and readable than to make it 1%
|
||||
faster.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
WTF is that function good for ....:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user