Revert "CrystalHD: Refine heuristic logic."
This reverts commit f968ef922d
.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f968ef922d
commit
3188d33a11
@ -512,7 +512,8 @@ static inline CopyRet copy_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx,
|
||||
{
|
||||
BC_STATUS ret;
|
||||
BC_DTS_STATUS decoder_status;
|
||||
uint8_t trust_interlaced;
|
||||
uint8_t confirmed_interlaced;
|
||||
uint8_t ignore_interlaced;
|
||||
uint8_t interlaced;
|
||||
|
||||
CHDContext *priv = avctx->priv_data;
|
||||
@ -560,50 +561,50 @@ static inline CopyRet copy_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For most content, we can trust the interlaced flag returned
|
||||
* by the hardware, but sometimes we can't. These are the
|
||||
* conditions under which we can trust the flag:
|
||||
* If we're expecting a second field, or we know that the next
|
||||
* picture has the same number as the current picture, then we're
|
||||
* definitely interlaced.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 1) It's not h.264 content
|
||||
* 2) The UNKNOWN_SRC flag is not set
|
||||
* 3) We know we're expecting a second field
|
||||
* 4) The hardware reports this picture and the next picture
|
||||
* have the same picture number.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note that there can still be interlaced content that will
|
||||
* fail this check, if the hardware hasn't decoded the next
|
||||
* picture or if there is a corruption in the stream. (In either
|
||||
* case a 0 will be returned for the next picture number)
|
||||
* Note that this test can return false negatives if the hardware
|
||||
* hasn't decoded the next picture or if there is a corruption in
|
||||
* the stream. (In either case a 0 will be returned for the next
|
||||
* picture number)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
trust_interlaced = avctx->codec->id != CODEC_ID_H264 ||
|
||||
!(output->PicInfo.flags & VDEC_FLAG_UNKNOWN_SRC) ||
|
||||
priv->need_second_field ||
|
||||
(decoder_status.picNumFlags & ~0x40000000) ==
|
||||
output->PicInfo.picture_number;
|
||||
confirmed_interlaced = ((decoder_status.picNumFlags & ~0x40000000) ==
|
||||
output->PicInfo.picture_number) ||
|
||||
priv->need_second_field;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we got a false negative for trust_interlaced on the first field,
|
||||
* If we got a false negative for confirmed_interlaced on the first field,
|
||||
* we will realise our mistake here when we see that the picture number is that
|
||||
* of the previous picture. We cannot recover the frame and should discard the
|
||||
* second field to keep the correct number of output frames.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (output->PicInfo.picture_number == priv->last_picture && !priv->need_second_field) {
|
||||
av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_WARNING,
|
||||
"Incorrectly guessed progressive frame. Discarding second field\n");
|
||||
"Incorrectly guessed progressie frame. Discarding second field\n");
|
||||
/* Returning without providing a picture. */
|
||||
return RET_OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
interlaced = (output->PicInfo.flags & VDEC_FLAG_INTERLACED_SRC) &&
|
||||
trust_interlaced;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Testing has, so far, shown that we can't trust the interlaced flag for
|
||||
* H.264 content when VDEC_FLAG_UNKNOWN_SRC is set.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ignore_interlaced = avctx->codec->id == CODEC_ID_H264 &&
|
||||
(output->PicInfo.flags & VDEC_FLAG_UNKNOWN_SRC) &&
|
||||
(pic_type == 0 || pic_type == PICT_FRAME ||
|
||||
!confirmed_interlaced);
|
||||
interlaced = (output->PicInfo.flags & VDEC_FLAG_INTERLACED_SRC) &&
|
||||
(!ignore_interlaced || confirmed_interlaced);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!trust_interlaced && (decoder_status.picNumFlags & ~0x40000000) == 0) {
|
||||
av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_VERBOSE,
|
||||
if (ignore_interlaced && (decoder_status.picNumFlags & ~0x40000000) == 0) {
|
||||
av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_WARNING,
|
||||
"Next picture number unknown. Assuming progressive frame.\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_VERBOSE, "Interlaced state: %d | trust_interlaced %d\n",
|
||||
interlaced, trust_interlaced);
|
||||
av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_VERBOSE, "Interlaced state: %d | ignore_interlaced %d\n",
|
||||
interlaced, ignore_interlaced);
|
||||
|
||||
if (priv->pic.data[0] && !priv->need_second_field)
|
||||
avctx->release_buffer(avctx, &priv->pic);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user