generic-library/cxx
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Mark 2072 as complete; we already do this

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@249347 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Marshall Clow 2015-10-05 20:21:54 +00:00
parent f8941c14a4
commit 960bd0c6f8
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
www/kona.html
View File

@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
<table id="issues" border="1">
<tr><th>Issue #</th><th>Issue Name</th><th>Meeting</th><th>Status</th></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#1169">1169</a></td><td><tt>num_get</tt> not fully compatible with <tt>strto*</tt></td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2072">2072</a></td><td>Unclear wording about capacity of temporary buffers</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2072">2072</a></td><td>Unclear wording about capacity of temporary buffers</td><td>Kona</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2101">2101</a></td><td>Some transformation types can produce impossible types</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2111">2111</a></td><td>Which <tt>unexpected</tt>&#47;<tt>terminate</tt> handler is called from the exception handling runtime?</td><td>Kona</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2119">2119</a></td><td>Missing <tt>hash</tt> specializations for extended integer types</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
<h3>Comments about the issues</h3>
<ul>
<li>1169 - We currently have a single function __num_get_float that calls strtold_l, and then casts down to the appropriate floating point type. That will have to change.</li>
<li>2072 - I don't think there's anything to do here; this is just making the wording better.</li>
<li><i>2072 - We already do this; this is just making the wording better.</i></li>
<li>2101 - Need to write some careful test cases. In particular, need to check function types with/without const/ref qualifiers. Currently we get this wrong. Installing metashell to play with these.</li>
<li><i>2111 - Resolved an ambiguity by calling it out. No code change required.</i></li>
<li>2119 - Hashes for all integral and enumeration types. Research needed</li>