SSL_ENABLE_ALPN can be used for preprocessor ALPN feature detection,
but not SSL_NEXT_PROTO_SELECTED, since it is an enum value and not a
preprocessor macro.
This was already mostly being done, except that analysis after the
test still assumed that the valgrind log files would be available. An
alternative way to handle the valgrind + gdb combination could be to
enable one of the valgrind debugger hooks.
lib1515.c:38:26 warning: unused parameter 'curl'
lib1515.c:38:81 warning: unused parameter 'ptr'
lib1515.c:38:5 warning: no previous prototype for 'debug_callback'
lib1515.c:46:5 warning: no previous prototype for 'do_one_request'
lib1515.c:120:3 warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
As well as some code policing such as white space and braces.
Not comma, which is an inconsistency and a mistake probably inherited
from the examples section of RFC1867.
This bug has been present since the day curl started to support
multipart formposts, back in the 90s.
Reported-by: Rob Davies
Bug: http://curl.haxx.se/bug/view.cgi?id=1333
When using the multi socket interface, libcurl calls the
curl_multi_timer_callback asking to be woken up after
CURL_TIMEOUT_EXPECT_100 milliseconds.
After the timeout has expired, calling curl_multi_socket_action with
CURL_SOCKET_TIMEOUT as sockfd leads libcurl to check expired
timeouts. When handling the 100-continue one, the following check in
Curl_readwrite() fails if exactly CURL_TIMEOUT_EXPECT_100 milliseconds
passed since the timeout has been set!
It seems logical to consider that having waited for exactly
CURL_TIMEOUT_EXPECT_100 ms is enough.
Bug: http://curl.haxx.se/bug/view.cgi?id=1334
Fix for bug #1303 (030a2b8cb) was not complete.
libcurl still pruned DNS entries added manually
after detecting a dead connection. This test
checks such behavior.
Test-case 1515 reproduces bug #1303, where libcurl
would incorrectly prune DNS entries added via
CURLOPT_RESOLVE after the DNS_CACHE_TIMEOUT had
expired.
A server might respond with a content-encoding header and a response
that was encoded accordingly in HTTP-draft-09/2.0 mode, even if the
client did not send an accept-encoding header earlier. The server might
not send a content-encoding header if the identity encoding was used to
encode the response.
See:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09#section-9.3
