e5e61a0a920a8e6560735b2e565c3bd7a1e35ba5
gdb was happy with what we had, but libgcc and libunwind weren't.
libgcc is happy with the kernel's restorer (because of the extra nop),
though libunwind looks like it's going to need code changes regardless.
We could make our restorer more like the kernel's one, but why bother
when we can just let the kernel supply the canonical one?
Bug: 17436734
(cherry picked from commit 1cff9a8964)
Change-Id: Ie13d73fd97395e1979a67c2294e036a97c50000d
Description
No description provided
Languages
C
68.1%
Assembly
16.2%
C++
13.4%
Makefile
1.1%
Python
0.9%
Other
0.2%