Otherwise the gcc compiler warning doesn't show up.
Add -Wno-error to fortify related tests. Fortify related tests
are expected to be examples of bad programs, and in many
cases shouldn't compile cleanly. Rewriting them to compile
cleanly isn't feasible nor desirable.
Bug: 17784968
Change-Id: I93bececa7444d965f18c7c27d46e7abce5c49a02
Otherwise the gcc compiler warning doesn't show up.
Delete some unittests. These unittests no longer compile cleanly
using -Wall -Werror, and rewriting them to compile cleanly
isn't feasible.
Bug: 17784968
Change-Id: I9bbdc7b6a1c2ac75754f5d0f90782e0dfae66721
Unlike times(), clock_gettime() is implemented as a vDSO on many architectures.
So, using clock_gettime() will return a more accurate time and do so with less
overhead because it does have the overhead of calling into the kernel.
It is also significantly more accurate because it measures the actual time in
nanoseconds rather than the number of ticks (typically 1 millisecond or more).
Bug: 17814435
Change-Id: Id4945d9f387330518f78669809639952e9227ed9
The previous pthread_key_create_many test was really
pthread_key_create_all, which has proven very difficult to test
correctly (because it is affected by any other parts of the system using
pthread keys, and that can vary with test ordering). It also tested
expected values of PTHREAD_KEYS_MAX and the associated sysconf() value,
rather than those being in their own test.
Instead, split this test into a few distinct tests:
* pthread.pthread_keys_max
* pthread._SC_THREAD_KEYS_MAX_big_enough_for_POSIX
* pthread.pthread_key_many_distinct
* We actually didn't have a test to ensure that the keys we were
creating were distinct.
* pthread.pthread_key_EAGAIN
* Make sure pthread_key_create() will _eventually_ fail with
EAGAIN, not at a (sometimes incorrectly) predetermined maximum.
Change-Id: Iff1e4fdcc02404094bde0418122c64c227cf1702
libc and libc++ both define std::nothrow. libc's is a private symbol,
but this still causes issues when linking libc.a and libc++.a, since
private isn't effective until it has been linked. To fix this, just
allow multiple symbol definitions for the static tests.
Change-Id: Idbf19fefda47298c39360e3f5b6242b0b1a52fcc
It's not allowed for a shell user to create a fifo in /data/local/tmp.
Make the test do nothing if not run as root.
Bug: 17646702
(cherry picked from commit 6c69afdb6d)
Change-Id: Ia3a862ed4586413b7bb393557ab57e0a7141d888
Upstream has implemented lgammal/lgammal_r for ld128, and fixed the
sign problem we reported with all the lgamma*_r functions and -0.
Bug: 17471883
Change-Id: Ibb175d9cab67efae75f1010796fd44c9ba6ce4fc
From C99 standard: “The nextafter functions determine the next representable value, in the type of the function,
after x in the direction of y, where x and y are first converted to the type of the function”.
The next representable value of 0.0 in direction of -1.0 is -4.9406564584124654e-324, not 0.0.
Similar thing holds for nextafterf, nextafterl, nexttowardf, nexttoward, and nexttowardl.
The tests pass either way, since the error is within the tolerance, but how it is written is wrong.
Change-Id: I1338eeffe3de8031a48f46e1b07146bc07dc2f0a
Signed-off-by: Jingwei Zhang <jingwei.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mingwei Shi <mingwei.shi@intel.com>
Symbols from libraries opened with RTLD_LOCAL (default)
should not be visible via dlsym(RLTD_DEFAULT/RTLD_NEXT, .)
Bug: 17512583
Change-Id: I1758943081a67cf3d49ba5808e061b8251a91964
Expanded test for recursive libs. Fixed bug with unnecessary
soinfo_free of already loaded library.
Change-Id: I2cc19f2650c8b12a35feeac127ef608ebba44d88
There are number of changes in the way IFUNC related relocations are done:
1. IRELATIVE relocations are now supported for x86/x86_64 and arm64.
2. IFUNC relocations are now relying on static linker to generate
them in correct order - this removes necessety of additional
relocation pass for ifuncs.
3. Related to 2: rela?.dyn relocations are preformed before .plt ones.
4. Ifunc are resolved on symbol lookup this approach allowed to avoid
mprotect(PROT_WRITE) call on r-x program segments.
Bug: 17399706
Bug: 17177284
Change-Id: I414dd3e82bd47cc03442c5dfc7c279949aec51ed
Enable the -std=gnu++11 flag for libstdc++ static and
dynamic libs.
ScopeGuard uses DISABLE_ macros instead of '= delete';
Change-Id: I07e21b306f95fffd49345f7fa136cfdac61e0225
This patch fixes the problem with symbol search order
for dlsym(RTLD_DEFAULT/RTLD_NEXT, .) by loading libraries
and ld_preloads in correct order.
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=74255
Change-Id: If1ba5c807322409faa914e27ecb675e2c4541f0d
Attempt: 2
There were two problems here:
* This would fail when run with unlimited stack, because it didn't know
that bionic reports unlimited stacks as 8MiB.
* This would leave RLIMIT_STACK small, causing failures to exec (so the
popen and system tests would fail).
Change-Id: I5b92dc64ca089400223b2d9a3743e9b9d57c1bc2
