Added comments and an assert explaining that NACK hasn't been fully
implemented in the mt_rx_tx_test. Review URL: http://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/25018 git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@79 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
This commit is contained in:
parent
51f2453d98
commit
7925dd575f
@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ int MTRxTxTest(CmdArgs& args)
|
||||
WebRtc_Word32 numberOfCores = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
// error resilience/network
|
||||
// Nack support is currently not implemented in this test.
|
||||
bool nackEnabled = false;
|
||||
bool fecEnabled = false;
|
||||
WebRtc_UWord8 rttMS = 20;
|
||||
@ -216,6 +217,8 @@ int MTRxTxTest(CmdArgs& args)
|
||||
vcm->RegisterProtectionCallback(&protectionCallback);
|
||||
|
||||
outgoingTransport->SetLossPct(lossRate);
|
||||
// Nack support is currently not implemented in this test
|
||||
assert(nackEnabled == false);
|
||||
vcm->SetVideoProtection(kProtectionNack, nackEnabled);
|
||||
vcm->SetVideoProtection(kProtectionFEC, fecEnabled);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user