The only difference between the two was that the vp9 function allowed
for every step in the bilinear filter (16 steps) while vp8 only allowed
for half of those. Since all the call sites in vp9 (<< 1) the input, it
only ever used the same steps as vp8.
This will allow moving the subpel variance to vpx_dsp with the rest of
the variance functions.
Change-Id: I6fa2509350a2dc610c46b3e15bde98a15a084b75
in the sub_pixel_*variance* function the dst is aligned to 16 bytes and not
to 32 bytes - now load unaligned data
Change-Id: I2e0b9745543697efc56fefa32857ea10117af135
Optimizing 2 functions to process 32 elements in parallel instead of 16:
1. vp9_sub_pixel_avg_variance64x64
2. vp9_sub_pixel_avg_variance32x32
both of those function were calling vp9_sub_pixel_avg_variance16xh_ssse3
instead of calling that function, it calls vp9_sub_pixel_avg_variance32xh_avx2
that is written in avx2 and process 32 elements in parallel.
This Optimization gave 80% function level gain and 2% user level gain
Change-Id: Iea694654e1b7612dc6ed11e2626208c2179502c8
Optimizing 2 functions to process 32 elements in parallel instead of 16:
1. vp9_sub_pixel_variance64x64
2. vp9_sub_pixel_variance32x32
both of those function were calling vp9_sub_pixel_variance16xh_ssse3
instead of calling that function, it calls vp9_sub_pixel_variance32xh_avx2
that is written in avx2 and process 32 elements in parallel.
This Optimization gave 70% function level gain and 2% user level gain
Change-Id: I4f5cb386b346ff6c878a094e1c3b37e418e50bde
