d207/d63/d45/d117/d135/d153
~9-45% better depending on the predictor on 32-bit ARM, similar range on
x86-64
this matches the non-highbitdepth implementation
BUG=webm:1316
Change-Id: Iddebdf7c58c6f31c47cae04da95c6e5318200e4c
the results along the top and left border are then stored with a moving
window into the vector.
~40-67% faster on ARM, ~40-77+% on x86 depending on the block size.
Change-Id: Iab369aa2946a3ae4eb7290d512868fe5db92dbc8
This experiment allows using full above/right edges for all transform
sizes whenever available (for d45/d63), and adds bottom/left edges for
d207.
See issue 1043.
Change-Id: I5cf7f345e783e8539bb6b6d2c9972fb1d6d0a78b
This is more a proof of concept than anything else. The problem here
isn't so much how to code it, but rather where to place the resulting
code. All intrapred DSP code lives in vpx_dsp, so do we want the vp10
specific intra pred functions to live there, or in vp10/?
See issue 1015.
Change-Id: I675f7badcc8e18fd99a9553910ecf3ddf81f0a05
I've added a few new functions (d45e, d63e, he, ve) to cover the
filtered h/v 4x4 predictors that are vp8-specific, the "correct"
d45 with the correctly filtered bottom-right pixel (as opposed to
the unfiltered version in vp9), and the "broken" d63 with weirdly
filtered bottom-right pixels (which is correctly filtered in vp9).
There may be a minor performance impact on all systems because we
have to do an extra copy of the Above pixel array to incorporate
the topleft pixel in the same array (thus fitting the vpx_dsp API).
In addition, armv6 will have a more serious performance impact b/c
I removed the armv6/vp8-specific assembly. I'm not sure anyone
cares...
Change-Id: I7f9e5ebee11d8e21aca2cd517a69eefc181b2e86
