vpx/vp8/common/reconinter.c

1235 lines
40 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
/*
* Copyright (c) 2010 The WebM project authors. All Rights Reserved.
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
*
* Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license
* that can be found in the LICENSE file in the root of the source
* tree. An additional intellectual property rights grant can be found
* in the file PATENTS. All contributing project authors may
* be found in the AUTHORS file in the root of the source tree.
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
*/
#include "vpx_ports/config.h"
#include "vpx/vpx_integer.h"
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
#include "recon.h"
#include "subpixel.h"
#include "blockd.h"
#include "reconinter.h"
#if CONFIG_RUNTIME_CPU_DETECT
#include "onyxc_int.h"
#endif
void vp8_copy_mem16x16_c(
unsigned char *src,
int src_stride,
unsigned char *dst,
int dst_stride) {
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
int r;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
for (r = 0; r < 16; r++) {
#if !(CONFIG_FAST_UNALIGNED)
dst[0] = src[0];
dst[1] = src[1];
dst[2] = src[2];
dst[3] = src[3];
dst[4] = src[4];
dst[5] = src[5];
dst[6] = src[6];
dst[7] = src[7];
dst[8] = src[8];
dst[9] = src[9];
dst[10] = src[10];
dst[11] = src[11];
dst[12] = src[12];
dst[13] = src[13];
dst[14] = src[14];
dst[15] = src[15];
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
#else
((uint32_t *)dst)[0] = ((uint32_t *)src)[0];
((uint32_t *)dst)[1] = ((uint32_t *)src)[1];
((uint32_t *)dst)[2] = ((uint32_t *)src)[2];
((uint32_t *)dst)[3] = ((uint32_t *)src)[3];
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
#endif
src += src_stride;
dst += dst_stride;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
void vp8_avg_mem16x16_c(
unsigned char *src,
int src_stride,
unsigned char *dst,
int dst_stride) {
int r;
for (r = 0; r < 16; r++) {
int n;
for (n = 0; n < 16; n++) {
dst[n] = (dst[n] + src[n] + 1) >> 1;
}
src += src_stride;
dst += dst_stride;
}
}
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
void vp8_copy_mem8x8_c(
unsigned char *src,
int src_stride,
unsigned char *dst,
int dst_stride) {
int r;
for (r = 0; r < 8; r++) {
#if !(CONFIG_FAST_UNALIGNED)
dst[0] = src[0];
dst[1] = src[1];
dst[2] = src[2];
dst[3] = src[3];
dst[4] = src[4];
dst[5] = src[5];
dst[6] = src[6];
dst[7] = src[7];
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
#else
((uint32_t *)dst)[0] = ((uint32_t *)src)[0];
((uint32_t *)dst)[1] = ((uint32_t *)src)[1];
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
#endif
src += src_stride;
dst += dst_stride;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
void vp8_avg_mem8x8_c(
unsigned char *src,
int src_stride,
unsigned char *dst,
int dst_stride) {
int r;
for (r = 0; r < 8; r++) {
int n;
for (n = 0; n < 8; n++) {
dst[n] = (dst[n] + src[n] + 1) >> 1;
}
src += src_stride;
dst += dst_stride;
}
}
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
void vp8_copy_mem8x4_c(
unsigned char *src,
int src_stride,
unsigned char *dst,
int dst_stride) {
int r;
for (r = 0; r < 4; r++) {
#if !(CONFIG_FAST_UNALIGNED)
dst[0] = src[0];
dst[1] = src[1];
dst[2] = src[2];
dst[3] = src[3];
dst[4] = src[4];
dst[5] = src[5];
dst[6] = src[6];
dst[7] = src[7];
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
#else
((uint32_t *)dst)[0] = ((uint32_t *)src)[0];
((uint32_t *)dst)[1] = ((uint32_t *)src)[1];
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
#endif
src += src_stride;
dst += dst_stride;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
void vp8_build_inter_predictors_b(BLOCKD *d, int pitch, vp8_subpix_fn_t sppf) {
int r;
unsigned char *ptr_base;
unsigned char *ptr;
unsigned char *pred_ptr = d->predictor;
int_mv mv;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
ptr_base = *(d->base_pre);
mv.as_int = d->bmi.as_mv.first.as_int;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
if (mv.as_mv.row & 7 || mv.as_mv.col & 7) {
ptr = ptr_base + d->pre + (mv.as_mv.row >> 3) * d->pre_stride + (mv.as_mv.col >> 3);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
sppf(ptr, d->pre_stride, (mv.as_mv.col & 7) << 1, (mv.as_mv.row & 7) << 1, pred_ptr, pitch);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#else
sppf(ptr, d->pre_stride, mv.as_mv.col & 7, mv.as_mv.row & 7, pred_ptr, pitch);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#endif
} else {
ptr_base += d->pre + (mv.as_mv.row >> 3) * d->pre_stride + (mv.as_mv.col >> 3);
ptr = ptr_base;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
for (r = 0; r < 4; r++) {
#if !(CONFIG_FAST_UNALIGNED)
pred_ptr[0] = ptr[0];
pred_ptr[1] = ptr[1];
pred_ptr[2] = ptr[2];
pred_ptr[3] = ptr[3];
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
#else
*(uint32_t *)pred_ptr = *(uint32_t *)ptr;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
#endif
pred_ptr += pitch;
ptr += d->pre_stride;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
}
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
/*
* Similar to vp8_build_inter_predictors_b(), but instead of storing the
* results in d->predictor, we average the contents of d->predictor (which
* come from an earlier call to vp8_build_inter_predictors_b()) with the
* predictor of the second reference frame / motion vector.
*/
void vp8_build_2nd_inter_predictors_b(BLOCKD *d, int pitch, vp8_subpix_fn_t sppf) {
int r;
unsigned char *ptr_base;
unsigned char *ptr;
unsigned char *pred_ptr = d->predictor;
int_mv mv;
ptr_base = *(d->base_second_pre);
mv.as_int = d->bmi.as_mv.second.as_int;
if (mv.as_mv.row & 7 || mv.as_mv.col & 7) {
ptr = ptr_base + d->pre + (mv.as_mv.row >> 3) * d->pre_stride + (mv.as_mv.col >> 3);
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
sppf(ptr, d->pre_stride, (mv.as_mv.col & 7) << 1, (mv.as_mv.row & 7) << 1, pred_ptr, pitch);
#else
sppf(ptr, d->pre_stride, mv.as_mv.col & 7, mv.as_mv.row & 7, pred_ptr, pitch);
#endif
} else {
ptr_base += d->pre + (mv.as_mv.row >> 3) * d->pre_stride + (mv.as_mv.col >> 3);
ptr = ptr_base;
for (r = 0; r < 4; r++) {
pred_ptr[0] = (pred_ptr[0] + ptr[0] + 1) >> 1;
pred_ptr[1] = (pred_ptr[1] + ptr[1] + 1) >> 1;
pred_ptr[2] = (pred_ptr[2] + ptr[2] + 1) >> 1;
pred_ptr[3] = (pred_ptr[3] + ptr[3] + 1) >> 1;
pred_ptr += pitch;
ptr += d->pre_stride;
}
}
}
static void build_inter_predictors4b(MACROBLOCKD *x, BLOCKD *d, int pitch) {
unsigned char *ptr_base;
unsigned char *ptr;
unsigned char *pred_ptr = d->predictor;
int_mv mv;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
ptr_base = *(d->base_pre);
mv.as_int = d->bmi.as_mv.first.as_int;
ptr = ptr_base + d->pre + (mv.as_mv.row >> 3) * d->pre_stride + (mv.as_mv.col >> 3);
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
if (mv.as_mv.row & 7 || mv.as_mv.col & 7) {
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
x->subpixel_predict8x8(ptr, d->pre_stride, (mv.as_mv.col & 7) << 1, (mv.as_mv.row & 7) << 1, pred_ptr, pitch);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#else
x->subpixel_predict8x8(ptr, d->pre_stride, mv.as_mv.col & 7, mv.as_mv.row & 7, pred_ptr, pitch);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#endif
} else {
RECON_INVOKE(&x->rtcd->recon, copy8x8)(ptr, d->pre_stride, pred_ptr, pitch);
}
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
/*
* Similar to build_inter_predictors_4b(), but instead of storing the
* results in d->predictor, we average the contents of d->predictor (which
* come from an earlier call to build_inter_predictors_4b()) with the
* predictor of the second reference frame / motion vector.
*/
static void build_2nd_inter_predictors4b(MACROBLOCKD *x, BLOCKD *d, int pitch) {
unsigned char *ptr_base;
unsigned char *ptr;
unsigned char *pred_ptr = d->predictor;
int_mv mv;
ptr_base = *(d->base_second_pre);
mv.as_int = d->bmi.as_mv.second.as_int;
ptr = ptr_base + d->pre + (mv.as_mv.row >> 3) * d->pre_stride + (mv.as_mv.col >> 3);
if (mv.as_mv.row & 7 || mv.as_mv.col & 7) {
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
x->subpixel_predict_avg8x8(ptr, d->pre_stride, (mv.as_mv.col & 7) << 1, (mv.as_mv.row & 7) << 1, pred_ptr, pitch);
#else
x->subpixel_predict_avg8x8(ptr, d->pre_stride, mv.as_mv.col & 7, mv.as_mv.row & 7, pred_ptr, pitch);
#endif
} else {
RECON_INVOKE(&x->rtcd->recon, avg8x8)(ptr, d->pre_stride, pred_ptr, pitch);
}
}
static void build_inter_predictors2b(MACROBLOCKD *x, BLOCKD *d, int pitch) {
unsigned char *ptr_base;
unsigned char *ptr;
unsigned char *pred_ptr = d->predictor;
int_mv mv;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
ptr_base = *(d->base_pre);
mv.as_int = d->bmi.as_mv.first.as_int;
ptr = ptr_base + d->pre + (mv.as_mv.row >> 3) * d->pre_stride + (mv.as_mv.col >> 3);
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
if (mv.as_mv.row & 7 || mv.as_mv.col & 7) {
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
x->subpixel_predict8x4(ptr, d->pre_stride, (mv.as_mv.col & 7) << 1, (mv.as_mv.row & 7) << 1, pred_ptr, pitch);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#else
x->subpixel_predict8x4(ptr, d->pre_stride, mv.as_mv.col & 7, mv.as_mv.row & 7, pred_ptr, pitch);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#endif
} else {
RECON_INVOKE(&x->rtcd->recon, copy8x4)(ptr, d->pre_stride, pred_ptr, pitch);
}
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
/*encoder only*/
#if CONFIG_PRED_FILTER
// Select the thresholded or non-thresholded filter
#define USE_THRESH_FILTER 0
#define PRED_FILT_LEN 5
static const int filt_shift = 4;
static const int pred_filter[PRED_FILT_LEN] = {1, 2, 10, 2, 1};
// Alternative filter {1, 1, 4, 1, 1}
#if !USE_THRESH_FILTER
void filter_mb(unsigned char *src, int src_stride,
unsigned char *dst, int dst_stride,
int width, int height) {
int i, j, k;
unsigned int Temp[32 * 32];
unsigned int *pTmp = Temp;
unsigned char *pSrc = src - (1 + src_stride) * (PRED_FILT_LEN / 2);
// Horizontal
for (i = 0; i < height + PRED_FILT_LEN - 1; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < width; j++) {
int sum = 0;
for (k = 0; k < PRED_FILT_LEN; k++)
sum += pSrc[j + k] * pred_filter[k];
pTmp[j] = sum;
}
pSrc += src_stride;
pTmp += width;
}
// Vertical
pTmp = Temp;
for (i = 0; i < width; i++) {
unsigned char *pDst = dst + i;
for (j = 0; j < height; j++) {
int sum = 0;
for (k = 0; k < PRED_FILT_LEN; k++)
sum += pTmp[(j + k) * width] * pred_filter[k];
// Round
sum = (sum + ((1 << (filt_shift << 1)) >> 1)) >> (filt_shift << 1);
pDst[j * dst_stride] = (sum < 0 ? 0 : sum > 255 ? 255 : sum);
}
++pTmp;
}
}
#else
// Based on vp8_post_proc_down_and_across_c (postproc.c)
void filter_mb(unsigned char *src, int src_stride,
unsigned char *dst, int dst_stride,
int width, int height) {
unsigned char *pSrc, *pDst;
int row;
int col;
int i;
int v;
unsigned char d[8];
/* TODO flimit should be linked to the quantizer value */
int flimit = 7;
for (row = 0; row < height; row++) {
/* post_proc_down for one row */
pSrc = src;
pDst = dst;
for (col = 0; col < width; col++) {
int kernel = (1 << (filt_shift - 1));
int v = pSrc[col];
for (i = -2; i <= 2; i++) {
if (abs(v - pSrc[col + i * src_stride]) > flimit)
goto down_skip_convolve;
kernel += pred_filter[2 + i] * pSrc[col + i * src_stride];
}
v = (kernel >> filt_shift);
down_skip_convolve:
pDst[col] = v;
}
/* now post_proc_across */
pSrc = dst;
pDst = dst;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
d[i] = pSrc[i];
for (col = 0; col < width; col++) {
int kernel = (1 << (filt_shift - 1));
v = pSrc[col];
d[col & 7] = v;
for (i = -2; i <= 2; i++) {
if (abs(v - pSrc[col + i]) > flimit)
goto across_skip_convolve;
kernel += pred_filter[2 + i] * pSrc[col + i];
}
d[col & 7] = (kernel >> filt_shift);
across_skip_convolve:
if (col >= 2)
pDst[col - 2] = d[(col - 2) & 7];
}
/* handle the last two pixels */
pDst[col - 2] = d[(col - 2) & 7];
pDst[col - 1] = d[(col - 1) & 7];
/* next row */
src += src_stride;
dst += dst_stride;
}
}
#endif // !USE_THRESH_FILTER
#endif // CONFIG_PRED_FILTER
void vp8_build_inter16x16_predictors_mbuv(MACROBLOCKD *xd) {
unsigned char *uptr, *vptr;
unsigned char *upred_ptr = &xd->predictor[256];
unsigned char *vpred_ptr = &xd->predictor[320];
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
int omv_row = xd->mode_info_context->mbmi.mv.as_mv.row;
int omv_col = xd->mode_info_context->mbmi.mv.as_mv.col;
int mv_row = omv_row;
int mv_col = omv_col;
int offset;
int pre_stride = xd->block[16].pre_stride;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
/* calc uv motion vectors */
if (mv_row < 0)
mv_row -= 1;
else
mv_row += 1;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
if (mv_col < 0)
mv_col -= 1;
else
mv_col += 1;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
mv_row /= 2;
mv_col /= 2;
mv_row &= xd->fullpixel_mask;
mv_col &= xd->fullpixel_mask;
offset = (mv_row >> 3) * pre_stride + (mv_col >> 3);
uptr = xd->pre.u_buffer + offset;
vptr = xd->pre.v_buffer + offset;
#if CONFIG_PRED_FILTER
if (xd->mode_info_context->mbmi.pred_filter_enabled) {
int i;
#if CONFIG_ENHANCED_INTERP
int Interp_Extend = 4; // 8-tap filter needs 3+4 pels extension
#else
int Interp_Extend = 3; // 6-tap filter needs 2+3 pels extension
#endif
int len = 7 + (Interp_Extend << 1);
unsigned char Temp[32 * 32]; // Input data required by sub-pel filter
unsigned char *pTemp = Temp + (Interp_Extend - 1) * (len + 1);
unsigned char *pSrc = uptr;
unsigned char *pDst = upred_ptr;
// U & V
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
if ((omv_row | omv_col) & 15) {
// Copy extended MB into Temp array, applying the spatial filter
filter_mb(pSrc - (Interp_Extend - 1) * (pre_stride + 1), pre_stride,
Temp, len, len, len);
// Sub-pel interpolation
xd->subpixel_predict8x8(pTemp, len, omv_col & 15,
omv_row & 15, pDst, 8);
}
#else /* CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV */
if ((mv_row | mv_col) & 7) {
// Copy extended MB into Temp array, applying the spatial filter
filter_mb(pSrc - (Interp_Extend - 1) * (pre_stride + 1), pre_stride,
Temp, len, len, len);
// Sub-pel interpolation
xd->subpixel_predict8x8(pTemp, len, mv_col & 7,
mv_row & 7, pDst, 8);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV */
else {
// Apply prediction filter as we copy from source to destination
filter_mb(pSrc, pre_stride, pDst, 8, 8, 8);
}
// V
pSrc = vptr;
pDst = vpred_ptr;
}
} else
#endif
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
if ((omv_row | omv_col) & 15) {
xd->subpixel_predict8x8(uptr, pre_stride, omv_col & 15, omv_row & 15, upred_ptr, 8);
xd->subpixel_predict8x8(vptr, pre_stride, omv_col & 15, omv_row & 15, vpred_ptr, 8);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
}
#else /* CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV */
if ((mv_row | mv_col) & 7) {
xd->subpixel_predict8x8(uptr, pre_stride, mv_col & 7, mv_row & 7, upred_ptr, 8);
xd->subpixel_predict8x8(vptr, pre_stride, mv_col & 7, mv_row & 7, vpred_ptr, 8);
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#endif /* CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV */
else {
RECON_INVOKE(&xd->rtcd->recon, copy8x8)(uptr, pre_stride, upred_ptr, 8);
RECON_INVOKE(&xd->rtcd->recon, copy8x8)(vptr, pre_stride, vpred_ptr, 8);
}
}
/*encoder only*/
void vp8_build_inter4x4_predictors_mbuv(MACROBLOCKD *x) {
int i, j;
/* build uv mvs */
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < 2; j++) {
int yoffset = i * 8 + j * 2;
int uoffset = 16 + i * 2 + j;
int voffset = 20 + i * 2 + j;
int temp;
temp = x->block[yoffset ].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.row
+ x->block[yoffset + 1].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.row
+ x->block[yoffset + 4].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.row
+ x->block[yoffset + 5].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.row;
if (temp < 0) temp -= 4;
else temp += 4;
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.row = (temp / 8) & x->fullpixel_mask;
temp = x->block[yoffset ].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.col
+ x->block[yoffset + 1].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.col
+ x->block[yoffset + 4].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.col
+ x->block[yoffset + 5].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.col;
if (temp < 0) temp -= 4;
else temp += 4;
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.col = (temp / 8) & x->fullpixel_mask;
x->block[voffset].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.row =
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.row;
x->block[voffset].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.col =
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.col;
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.second_ref_frame) {
temp = x->block[yoffset ].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.row
+ x->block[yoffset + 1].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.row
+ x->block[yoffset + 4].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.row
+ x->block[yoffset + 5].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.row;
if (temp < 0) {
temp -= 4;
} else {
temp += 4;
}
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.row = (temp / 8) & x->fullpixel_mask;
temp = x->block[yoffset ].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.col
+ x->block[yoffset + 1].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.col
+ x->block[yoffset + 4].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.col
+ x->block[yoffset + 5].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.col;
if (temp < 0) {
temp -= 4;
} else {
temp += 4;
}
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.col = (temp / 8) & x->fullpixel_mask;
x->block[voffset].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.row =
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.row;
x->block[voffset].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.col =
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.col;
}
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
}
for (i = 16; i < 24; i += 2) {
BLOCKD *d0 = &x->block[i];
BLOCKD *d1 = &x->block[i + 1];
if (d0->bmi.as_mv.first.as_int == d1->bmi.as_mv.first.as_int)
build_inter_predictors2b(x, d0, 8);
else {
vp8_build_inter_predictors_b(d0, 8, x->subpixel_predict);
vp8_build_inter_predictors_b(d1, 8, x->subpixel_predict);
}
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.second_ref_frame) {
vp8_build_2nd_inter_predictors_b(d0, 8, x->subpixel_predict_avg);
vp8_build_2nd_inter_predictors_b(d1, 8, x->subpixel_predict_avg);
}
}
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
/*encoder only*/
void vp8_build_inter16x16_predictors_mby(MACROBLOCKD *xd) {
unsigned char *ptr_base;
unsigned char *ptr;
unsigned char *pred_ptr = xd->predictor;
int mv_row = xd->mode_info_context->mbmi.mv.as_mv.row;
int mv_col = xd->mode_info_context->mbmi.mv.as_mv.col;
int pre_stride = xd->block[0].pre_stride;
ptr_base = xd->pre.y_buffer;
ptr = ptr_base + (mv_row >> 3) * pre_stride + (mv_col >> 3);
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
#if CONFIG_PRED_FILTER
if (xd->mode_info_context->mbmi.pred_filter_enabled) {
// Produce predictor from the filtered source
if ((mv_row | mv_col) & 7) {
// Sub-pel filter needs extended input
#if CONFIG_ENHANCED_INTERP
int Interp_Extend = 4; // 8-tap filter needs 3+4 pels extension
#else
int Interp_Extend = 3; // 6-tap filter needs 2+3 pels extension
#endif
int len = 15 + (Interp_Extend << 1);
unsigned char Temp[32 * 32]; // Data required by sub-pel filter
unsigned char *pTemp = Temp + (Interp_Extend - 1) * (len + 1);
// Copy extended MB into Temp array, applying the spatial filter
filter_mb(ptr - (Interp_Extend - 1) * (pre_stride + 1), pre_stride,
Temp, len, len, len);
// Sub-pel interpolation
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
xd->subpixel_predict16x16(pTemp, len, (mv_col & 7) << 1,
(mv_row & 7) << 1, pred_ptr, 16);
#else
xd->subpixel_predict16x16(pTemp, len, mv_col & 7,
mv_row & 7, pred_ptr, 16);
#endif
} else {
// Apply spatial filter to create the prediction directly
filter_mb(ptr, pre_stride, pred_ptr, 16, 16, 16);
}
} else
#endif
if ((mv_row | mv_col) & 7) {
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
xd->subpixel_predict16x16(ptr, pre_stride, (mv_col & 7) << 1,
(mv_row & 7) << 1, pred_ptr, 16);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#else
xd->subpixel_predict16x16(ptr, pre_stride, mv_col & 7,
mv_row & 7, pred_ptr, 16);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#endif
} else {
RECON_INVOKE(&xd->rtcd->recon, copy16x16)(ptr, pre_stride, pred_ptr, 16);
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
}
static void clamp_mv_to_umv_border(MV *mv, const MACROBLOCKD *xd) {
/* If the MV points so far into the UMV border that no visible pixels
* are used for reconstruction, the subpel part of the MV can be
* discarded and the MV limited to 16 pixels with equivalent results.
*
* This limit kicks in at 19 pixels for the top and left edges, for
* the 16 pixels plus 3 taps right of the central pixel when subpel
* filtering. The bottom and right edges use 16 pixels plus 2 pixels
* left of the central pixel when filtering.
*/
if (mv->col < (xd->mb_to_left_edge - ((16 + INTERP_EXTEND) << 3)))
mv->col = xd->mb_to_left_edge - (16 << 3);
else if (mv->col > xd->mb_to_right_edge + ((15 + INTERP_EXTEND) << 3))
mv->col = xd->mb_to_right_edge + (16 << 3);
if (mv->row < (xd->mb_to_top_edge - ((16 + INTERP_EXTEND) << 3)))
mv->row = xd->mb_to_top_edge - (16 << 3);
else if (mv->row > xd->mb_to_bottom_edge + ((15 + INTERP_EXTEND) << 3))
mv->row = xd->mb_to_bottom_edge + (16 << 3);
}
/* A version of the above function for chroma block MVs.*/
static void clamp_uvmv_to_umv_border(MV *mv, const MACROBLOCKD *xd) {
mv->col = (2 * mv->col < (xd->mb_to_left_edge - ((16 + INTERP_EXTEND) << 3))) ?
(xd->mb_to_left_edge - (16 << 3)) >> 1 : mv->col;
mv->col = (2 * mv->col > xd->mb_to_right_edge + ((15 + INTERP_EXTEND) << 3)) ?
(xd->mb_to_right_edge + (16 << 3)) >> 1 : mv->col;
mv->row = (2 * mv->row < (xd->mb_to_top_edge - ((16 + INTERP_EXTEND) << 3))) ?
(xd->mb_to_top_edge - (16 << 3)) >> 1 : mv->row;
mv->row = (2 * mv->row > xd->mb_to_bottom_edge + ((15 + INTERP_EXTEND) << 3)) ?
(xd->mb_to_bottom_edge + (16 << 3)) >> 1 : mv->row;
}
Improved coding using 8x8 transform In summary, this commit encompasses a series of changes in attempt to improve the 8x8 transform based coding to help overall compression quality, please refer to the detailed commit history below for what are the rationale underly the series of changes: a. A frame level flag to indicate if 8x8 transform is used at all. b. 8x8 transform is not used for key frames and small image size. c. On inter coded frame, macroblocks using modes B_PRED, SPLIT_MV and I8X8_PRED are forced to using 4x4 transform based coding, the rest uses 8x8 transform based coding. d. Encoder and decoder has the same assumption on the relationship between prediction modes and transform size, therefore no signaling is encoded in bitstream. e. Mode decision process now calculate the rate and distortion scores using their respective transforms. Overall test results: 1. HD set http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/HD_t8x8_20120206.html (avg psnr: 3.09% glb psnr: 3.22%, ssim: 3.90%) 2. Cif set: http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/cif_t8x8_20120206.html (avg psnr: -0.03%, glb psnr: -0.02%, ssim: -0.04%) It should be noted here, as 8x8 transform coding itself is disabled for cif size clips, the 0.03% loss is purely from the 1 bit/frame flag overhead on if 8x8 transform is used or not for the frame. ---patch history for future reference--- Patch 1: this commit tries to select transform size based on macroblock prediction mode. If the size of a prediction mode is 16x16, then the macroblock is forced to use 8x8 transform. If the prediction mode is B_PRED, SPLITMV or I8X8_PRED, then the macroblock is forced to use 4x4 transform. Tests on the following HD clips showed mixed results: (all hd clips only used first 100 frames in the test) http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/hdmodebased8x8.html http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/hdmodebased8x8_log.html while the results are mixed and overall negative, it is interesting to see 8x8 helped a few of the clips. Patch 2: this patch tries to hard-wire selection of transform size based on prediction modes without using segmentation to signal the transform size. encoder and decoder both takes the same assumption that all macroblocks use 8x8 transform except when prediciton mode is B_PRED, I8X8_PRED or SPLITMV. Test results are as follows: http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/cifmodebase8x8_0125.html http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/hdmodebased8x8_0125log.html Interestingly, by removing the overhead or coding the segmentation, the results on this limited HD set have turn positive on average. Patch 3: this patch disabled the usage of 8x8 transform on key frames, and kept the logic from patch 2 for inter frames only. test results on HD set turned decidedly positive with 8x8 transform enabled on inter frame with 16x16 prediction modes: (avg psnr: .81% glb psnr: .82 ssim: .55%) http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/hdintermode8x8_0125.html results on cif set still negative overall Patch 4: continued from last patch, but now in mode decision process, the rate and distortion estimates are computed based on 8x8 transform results for MBs with modes associated with 8x8 transform. This patch also fixed a problem related to segment based eob coding when 8x8 transform is used. The patch significantly improved the results on HD clips: http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/hd8x8RDintermode.html (avg psnr: 2.70% glb psnr: 2.76% ssim: 3.34%) results on cif also improved, though they are still negative compared to baseline that uses 4x4 transform only: http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/cif8x8RDintermode.html (avg psnr: -.78% glb psnr: -.86% ssim: -.19%) Patch 5: This patch does 3 things: a. a bunch of decoder bug fixes, encodings and decodings were verified to have matched recon buffer on a number of encodes on cif size mobile and hd version of _pedestrian. b. the patch further improved the rate distortion calculation of MBS that use 8x8 transform. This provided some further gain on compression. c. the patch also got the experimental work SEG_LVL_EOB to work with 8x8 transformed macroblock, test results indicates it improves the cif set but hurt the HD set slightly. Tests results on HD clips: http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/HD_t8x8_20120201.html (avg psnr: 3.19% glb psnr: 3.30% ssim: 3.93%) Test results on cif clips: http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/cif_t8x8_20120201.html (avg psnr: -.47% glb psnr: -.51% ssim: +.28%) Patch 6: Added a frame level flag to indicate if 8x8 transform is allowed at all. temporarily the decision is based on frame size, can be optimized later one. This get the cif results to basically unchanged, with one bit per frame overhead on both cif and hd clips. Patch 8: Rebase and Merge to head by PGW. Fixed some suspect 4s that look like hey should be 64s in regard to segmented EOB. Perhaps #defines would be bette. Bulit and tested without T8x8 enabled and produces unchanged output. Patch 9: Corrected misalligned code/decode of "txfm_mode" bit. Limited testing for correct encode and decode with T8x8 configured on derf clips. Change-Id: I156e1405d25f81579d579dff8ab9af53944ec49c
2012-02-10 01:12:23 +01:00
void vp8_build_inter16x16_predictors_mb(MACROBLOCKD *x,
unsigned char *dst_y,
unsigned char *dst_u,
unsigned char *dst_v,
int dst_ystride,
int dst_uvstride) {
int offset;
unsigned char *ptr;
unsigned char *uptr, *vptr;
int_mv _o16x16mv;
int_mv _16x16mv;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
unsigned char *ptr_base = x->pre.y_buffer;
int pre_stride = x->block[0].pre_stride;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
_16x16mv.as_int = x->mode_info_context->mbmi.mv.as_int;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.need_to_clamp_mvs) {
clamp_mv_to_umv_border(&_16x16mv.as_mv, x);
}
ptr = ptr_base + (_16x16mv.as_mv.row >> 3) * pre_stride +
(_16x16mv.as_mv.col >> 3);
#if CONFIG_PRED_FILTER
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.pred_filter_enabled) {
if (_16x16mv.as_int & 0x00070007) {
// Sub-pel filter needs extended input
#if CONFIG_ENHANCED_INTERP
int Interp_Extend = 4; // 8-tap filter needs 3+4 pels extension
#else
int Interp_Extend = 3; // 6-tap filter needs 2+3 pels extension
#endif
int len = 15 + (Interp_Extend << 1);
unsigned char Temp[32 * 32]; // Data required by the sub-pel filter
unsigned char *pTemp = Temp + (Interp_Extend - 1) * (len + 1);
// Copy extended MB into Temp array, applying the spatial filter
filter_mb(ptr - (Interp_Extend - 1) * (pre_stride + 1), pre_stride,
Temp, len, len, len);
// Sub-pel filter
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
x->subpixel_predict16x16(pTemp, len,
(_16x16mv.as_mv.col & 7) << 1,
(_16x16mv.as_mv.row & 7) << 1,
dst_y, dst_ystride);
#else
x->subpixel_predict16x16(pTemp, len,
_16x16mv.as_mv.col & 7,
_16x16mv.as_mv.row & 7,
dst_y, dst_ystride);
#endif
} else {
// Apply spatial filter to create the prediction directly
filter_mb(ptr, pre_stride, dst_y, dst_ystride, 16, 16);
}
} else
#endif
if (_16x16mv.as_int & 0x00070007) {
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
x->subpixel_predict16x16(ptr, pre_stride, (_16x16mv.as_mv.col & 7) << 1,
(_16x16mv.as_mv.row & 7) << 1,
dst_y, dst_ystride);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#else
x->subpixel_predict16x16(ptr, pre_stride, _16x16mv.as_mv.col & 7,
_16x16mv.as_mv.row & 7, dst_y, dst_ystride);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#endif
} else {
RECON_INVOKE(&x->rtcd->recon, copy16x16)(ptr, pre_stride, dst_y,
dst_ystride);
}
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
_o16x16mv = _16x16mv;
/* calc uv motion vectors */
if (_16x16mv.as_mv.row < 0)
_16x16mv.as_mv.row -= 1;
else
_16x16mv.as_mv.row += 1;
if (_16x16mv.as_mv.col < 0)
_16x16mv.as_mv.col -= 1;
else
_16x16mv.as_mv.col += 1;
_16x16mv.as_mv.row /= 2;
_16x16mv.as_mv.col /= 2;
_16x16mv.as_mv.row &= x->fullpixel_mask;
_16x16mv.as_mv.col &= x->fullpixel_mask;
pre_stride >>= 1;
offset = (_16x16mv.as_mv.row >> 3) * pre_stride + (_16x16mv.as_mv.col >> 3);
uptr = x->pre.u_buffer + offset;
vptr = x->pre.v_buffer + offset;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
#if CONFIG_PRED_FILTER
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.pred_filter_enabled) {
int i;
unsigned char *pSrc = uptr;
unsigned char *pDst = dst_u;
#if CONFIG_ENHANCED_INTERP
int Interp_Extend = 4; // 8-tap filter needs 3+4 pels extension
#else
int Interp_Extend = 3; // 6-tap filter needs 2+3 pels extension
#endif
int len = 7 + (Interp_Extend << 1);
unsigned char Temp[32 * 32]; // Data required by the sub-pel filter
unsigned char *pTemp = Temp + (Interp_Extend - 1) * (len + 1);
// U & V
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
if (_o16x16mv.as_int & 0x000f000f) {
// Copy extended MB into Temp array, applying the spatial filter
filter_mb(pSrc - (Interp_Extend - 1) * (pre_stride + 1), pre_stride,
Temp, len, len, len);
// Sub-pel filter
x->subpixel_predict8x8(pTemp, len,
_o16x16mv.as_mv.col & 15,
_o16x16mv.as_mv.row & 15,
pDst, dst_uvstride);
}
#else /* CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV */
if (_16x16mv.as_int & 0x00070007) {
// Copy extended MB into Temp array, applying the spatial filter
filter_mb(pSrc - (Interp_Extend - 1) * (pre_stride + 1), pre_stride,
Temp, len, len, len);
// Sub-pel filter
x->subpixel_predict8x8(pTemp, len,
_16x16mv.as_mv.col & 7,
_16x16mv.as_mv.row & 7,
pDst, dst_uvstride);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV */
else {
filter_mb(pSrc, pre_stride, pDst, dst_uvstride, 8, 8);
}
// V
pSrc = vptr;
pDst = dst_v;
}
} else
#endif
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
if (_o16x16mv.as_int & 0x000f000f) {
x->subpixel_predict8x8(uptr, pre_stride, _o16x16mv.as_mv.col & 15, _o16x16mv.as_mv.row & 15, dst_u, dst_uvstride);
x->subpixel_predict8x8(vptr, pre_stride, _o16x16mv.as_mv.col & 15, _o16x16mv.as_mv.row & 15, dst_v, dst_uvstride);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
}
#else /* CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV */
if (_16x16mv.as_int & 0x00070007) {
x->subpixel_predict8x8(uptr, pre_stride, _16x16mv.as_mv.col & 7, _16x16mv.as_mv.row & 7, dst_u, dst_uvstride);
x->subpixel_predict8x8(vptr, pre_stride, _16x16mv.as_mv.col & 7, _16x16mv.as_mv.row & 7, dst_v, dst_uvstride);
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#endif /* CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV */
else {
RECON_INVOKE(&x->rtcd->recon, copy8x8)(uptr, pre_stride, dst_u, dst_uvstride);
RECON_INVOKE(&x->rtcd->recon, copy8x8)(vptr, pre_stride, dst_v, dst_uvstride);
}
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
/*
* This function should be called after an initial call to
* vp8_build_inter16x16_predictors_mb() or _mby()/_mbuv().
* It will run a second sixtap filter on a (different) ref
* frame and average the result with the output of the
* first sixtap filter. The second reference frame is stored
* in x->second_pre (the reference frame index is in
* x->mode_info_context->mbmi.second_ref_frame). The second
* motion vector is x->mode_info_context->mbmi.second_mv.
*
* This allows blending prediction from two reference frames
* which sometimes leads to better prediction than from a
* single reference framer.
*/
void vp8_build_2nd_inter16x16_predictors_mb(MACROBLOCKD *x,
unsigned char *dst_y,
unsigned char *dst_u,
unsigned char *dst_v,
int dst_ystride,
int dst_uvstride) {
int offset;
unsigned char *ptr;
unsigned char *uptr, *vptr;
int_mv _16x16mv;
int mv_row;
int mv_col;
int omv_row, omv_col;
unsigned char *ptr_base = x->second_pre.y_buffer;
int pre_stride = x->block[0].pre_stride;
_16x16mv.as_int = x->mode_info_context->mbmi.second_mv.as_int;
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.need_to_clamp_secondmv) {
clamp_mv_to_umv_border(&_16x16mv.as_mv, x);
}
mv_row = _16x16mv.as_mv.row;
mv_col = _16x16mv.as_mv.col;
ptr = ptr_base + (mv_row >> 3) * pre_stride + (mv_col >> 3);
#if CONFIG_PRED_FILTER
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.pred_filter_enabled) {
if ((mv_row | mv_col) & 7) {
// Sub-pel filter needs extended input
#if CONFIG_ENHANCED_INTERP
int Interp_Extend = 4; // 8-tap filter needs 3+4 pels extension
#else
int Interp_Extend = 3; // 6-tap filter needs 2+3 pels extension
#endif
int len = 15 + (Interp_Extend << 1);
unsigned char Temp[32 * 32]; // Data required by sub-pel filter
unsigned char *pTemp = Temp + (Interp_Extend - 1) * (len + 1);
// Copy extended MB into Temp array, applying the spatial filter
filter_mb(ptr - (Interp_Extend - 1) * (pre_stride + 1), pre_stride,
Temp, len, len, len);
// Sub-pel filter
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
x->subpixel_predict_avg16x16(pTemp, len, (mv_col & 7) << 1,
(mv_row & 7) << 1, dst_y, dst_ystride);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#else
x->subpixel_predict_avg16x16(pTemp, len, mv_col & 7,
mv_row & 7, dst_y, dst_ystride);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#endif
} else {
// TODO Needs to AVERAGE with the dst_y
// For now, do not apply the prediction filter in these cases!
RECON_INVOKE(&x->rtcd->recon, avg16x16)(ptr, pre_stride, dst_y,
dst_ystride);
}
} else
#endif // CONFIG_PRED_FILTER
{
if ((mv_row | mv_col) & 7) {
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
x->subpixel_predict_avg16x16(ptr, pre_stride, (mv_col & 7) << 1,
(mv_row & 7) << 1, dst_y, dst_ystride);
#else
x->subpixel_predict_avg16x16(ptr, pre_stride, mv_col & 7,
mv_row & 7, dst_y, dst_ystride);
#endif
} else {
RECON_INVOKE(&x->rtcd->recon, avg16x16)(ptr, pre_stride, dst_y,
dst_ystride);
}
}
/* calc uv motion vectors */
omv_row = mv_row;
omv_col = mv_col;
mv_row = (mv_row + (mv_row > 0)) >> 1;
mv_col = (mv_col + (mv_col > 0)) >> 1;
mv_row &= x->fullpixel_mask;
mv_col &= x->fullpixel_mask;
pre_stride >>= 1;
offset = (mv_row >> 3) * pre_stride + (mv_col >> 3);
uptr = x->second_pre.u_buffer + offset;
vptr = x->second_pre.v_buffer + offset;
#if CONFIG_PRED_FILTER
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.pred_filter_enabled) {
int i;
#if CONFIG_ENHANCED_INTERP
int Interp_Extend = 4; // 8-tap filter needs 3+4 pels extension
#else
int Interp_Extend = 3; // 6-tap filter needs 2+3 pels extension
#endif
int len = 7 + (Interp_Extend << 1);
unsigned char Temp[32 * 32]; // Data required by sub-pel filter
unsigned char *pTemp = Temp + (Interp_Extend - 1) * (len + 1);
unsigned char *pSrc = uptr;
unsigned char *pDst = dst_u;
// U & V
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
if ((omv_row | omv_col) & 15) {
// Copy extended MB into Temp array, applying the spatial filter
filter_mb(pSrc - (Interp_Extend - 1) * (pre_stride + 1), pre_stride,
Temp, len, len, len);
// Sub-pel filter
x->subpixel_predict_avg8x8(pTemp, len, omv_col & 15,
omv_row & 15, pDst, dst_uvstride);
}
#else /* CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV */
if ((mv_row | mv_col) & 7) {
// Copy extended MB into Temp array, applying the spatial filter
filter_mb(pSrc - (Interp_Extend - 1) * (pre_stride + 1), pre_stride,
Temp, len, len, len);
// Sub-pel filter
x->subpixel_predict_avg8x8(pTemp, len, mv_col & 7, mv_row & 7,
pDst, dst_uvstride);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV */
else {
// TODO Needs to AVERAGE with the dst_[u|v]
// For now, do not apply the prediction filter here!
RECON_INVOKE(&x->rtcd->recon, avg8x8)(pSrc, pre_stride, pDst,
dst_uvstride);
}
// V
pSrc = vptr;
pDst = dst_v;
}
} else
#endif // CONFIG_PRED_FILTER
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#if CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV
if ((omv_row | omv_col) & 15) {
x->subpixel_predict_avg8x8(uptr, pre_stride, omv_col & 15, omv_row & 15, dst_u, dst_uvstride);
x->subpixel_predict_avg8x8(vptr, pre_stride, omv_col & 15, omv_row & 15, dst_v, dst_uvstride);
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
}
#else /* CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV */
if ((mv_row | mv_col) & 7) {
x->subpixel_predict_avg8x8(uptr, pre_stride, mv_col & 7, mv_row & 7, dst_u, dst_uvstride);
x->subpixel_predict_avg8x8(vptr, pre_stride, mv_col & 7, mv_row & 7, dst_v, dst_uvstride);
}
Supporting high precision 1/8-pel motion vectors This is the initial patch for supporting 1/8th pel motion. Currently if we configure with enable-high-precision-mv, all motion vectors would default to 1/8 pel. Encode and decode syncs fine with the current code. In the next phase the code will be refactored so that we can choose the 1/8 pel mode adaptively at a frame/segment/mb level. Derf results: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hpmv.html (about 0.83% better than 8-tap interpoaltion) Patch 3: Rebased. Also adding 1/16th pel interpolation for U and V Patch 4: HD results. http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterp_hd_hpmv.html Seems impressive (unless I am doing something wrong). Patch 5: Added mmx/sse for bilateral filtering, as well as enforced use of c-versions of subpel filters with 8-taps and 1/16th pel; Also redesigned the 8-tap filters to reduce the cut-off in order to introduce a denoising effect. There is a new configure option sixteenth-subpel-uv which will use 1/16 th pel interpolation for uv, if the motion vectors have 1/8 pel accuracy. With the fixes the results are promising on the derf set. The enhanced interpolation option with 8-taps alone gives 3% improvement over thei derf set: http://www.corp.google.com/~debargha/vp8_results/enhinterpn.html Results on high precision mv and on the hd set are to follow. Patch 6: Adding a missing condition for CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV in vp8/common/x86/x86_systemdependent.c Patch 7: Cleaning up various debug messages. Patch 8: Merge conflict Change-Id: I5b1d844457aefd7414a9e4e0e06c6ed38fd8cc04
2012-02-16 18:29:54 +01:00
#endif /* CONFIG_SIXTEENTH_SUBPEL_UV */
else {
RECON_INVOKE(&x->rtcd->recon, avg8x8)(uptr, pre_stride, dst_u, dst_uvstride);
RECON_INVOKE(&x->rtcd->recon, avg8x8)(vptr, pre_stride, dst_v, dst_uvstride);
}
}
static void build_inter4x4_predictors_mb(MACROBLOCKD *x) {
int i;
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.partitioning < 3) {
x->block[ 0].bmi = x->mode_info_context->bmi[ 0];
x->block[ 2].bmi = x->mode_info_context->bmi[ 2];
x->block[ 8].bmi = x->mode_info_context->bmi[ 8];
x->block[10].bmi = x->mode_info_context->bmi[10];
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.need_to_clamp_mvs) {
clamp_mv_to_umv_border(&x->block[ 0].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv, x);
clamp_mv_to_umv_border(&x->block[ 2].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv, x);
clamp_mv_to_umv_border(&x->block[ 8].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv, x);
clamp_mv_to_umv_border(&x->block[10].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv, x);
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.second_ref_frame) {
clamp_mv_to_umv_border(&x->block[ 0].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv, x);
clamp_mv_to_umv_border(&x->block[ 2].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv, x);
clamp_mv_to_umv_border(&x->block[ 8].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv, x);
clamp_mv_to_umv_border(&x->block[10].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv, x);
}
}
Improved coding using 8x8 transform In summary, this commit encompasses a series of changes in attempt to improve the 8x8 transform based coding to help overall compression quality, please refer to the detailed commit history below for what are the rationale underly the series of changes: a. A frame level flag to indicate if 8x8 transform is used at all. b. 8x8 transform is not used for key frames and small image size. c. On inter coded frame, macroblocks using modes B_PRED, SPLIT_MV and I8X8_PRED are forced to using 4x4 transform based coding, the rest uses 8x8 transform based coding. d. Encoder and decoder has the same assumption on the relationship between prediction modes and transform size, therefore no signaling is encoded in bitstream. e. Mode decision process now calculate the rate and distortion scores using their respective transforms. Overall test results: 1. HD set http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/HD_t8x8_20120206.html (avg psnr: 3.09% glb psnr: 3.22%, ssim: 3.90%) 2. Cif set: http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/cif_t8x8_20120206.html (avg psnr: -0.03%, glb psnr: -0.02%, ssim: -0.04%) It should be noted here, as 8x8 transform coding itself is disabled for cif size clips, the 0.03% loss is purely from the 1 bit/frame flag overhead on if 8x8 transform is used or not for the frame. ---patch history for future reference--- Patch 1: this commit tries to select transform size based on macroblock prediction mode. If the size of a prediction mode is 16x16, then the macroblock is forced to use 8x8 transform. If the prediction mode is B_PRED, SPLITMV or I8X8_PRED, then the macroblock is forced to use 4x4 transform. Tests on the following HD clips showed mixed results: (all hd clips only used first 100 frames in the test) http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/hdmodebased8x8.html http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/hdmodebased8x8_log.html while the results are mixed and overall negative, it is interesting to see 8x8 helped a few of the clips. Patch 2: this patch tries to hard-wire selection of transform size based on prediction modes without using segmentation to signal the transform size. encoder and decoder both takes the same assumption that all macroblocks use 8x8 transform except when prediciton mode is B_PRED, I8X8_PRED or SPLITMV. Test results are as follows: http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/cifmodebase8x8_0125.html http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/hdmodebased8x8_0125log.html Interestingly, by removing the overhead or coding the segmentation, the results on this limited HD set have turn positive on average. Patch 3: this patch disabled the usage of 8x8 transform on key frames, and kept the logic from patch 2 for inter frames only. test results on HD set turned decidedly positive with 8x8 transform enabled on inter frame with 16x16 prediction modes: (avg psnr: .81% glb psnr: .82 ssim: .55%) http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/hdintermode8x8_0125.html results on cif set still negative overall Patch 4: continued from last patch, but now in mode decision process, the rate and distortion estimates are computed based on 8x8 transform results for MBs with modes associated with 8x8 transform. This patch also fixed a problem related to segment based eob coding when 8x8 transform is used. The patch significantly improved the results on HD clips: http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/hd8x8RDintermode.html (avg psnr: 2.70% glb psnr: 2.76% ssim: 3.34%) results on cif also improved, though they are still negative compared to baseline that uses 4x4 transform only: http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/cif8x8RDintermode.html (avg psnr: -.78% glb psnr: -.86% ssim: -.19%) Patch 5: This patch does 3 things: a. a bunch of decoder bug fixes, encodings and decodings were verified to have matched recon buffer on a number of encodes on cif size mobile and hd version of _pedestrian. b. the patch further improved the rate distortion calculation of MBS that use 8x8 transform. This provided some further gain on compression. c. the patch also got the experimental work SEG_LVL_EOB to work with 8x8 transformed macroblock, test results indicates it improves the cif set but hurt the HD set slightly. Tests results on HD clips: http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/HD_t8x8_20120201.html (avg psnr: 3.19% glb psnr: 3.30% ssim: 3.93%) Test results on cif clips: http://www.corp.google.com/~yaowu/no_crawl/t8x8/cif_t8x8_20120201.html (avg psnr: -.47% glb psnr: -.51% ssim: +.28%) Patch 6: Added a frame level flag to indicate if 8x8 transform is allowed at all. temporarily the decision is based on frame size, can be optimized later one. This get the cif results to basically unchanged, with one bit per frame overhead on both cif and hd clips. Patch 8: Rebase and Merge to head by PGW. Fixed some suspect 4s that look like hey should be 64s in regard to segmented EOB. Perhaps #defines would be bette. Bulit and tested without T8x8 enabled and produces unchanged output. Patch 9: Corrected misalligned code/decode of "txfm_mode" bit. Limited testing for correct encode and decode with T8x8 configured on derf clips. Change-Id: I156e1405d25f81579d579dff8ab9af53944ec49c
2012-02-10 01:12:23 +01:00
build_inter_predictors4b(x, &x->block[ 0], 16);
build_inter_predictors4b(x, &x->block[ 2], 16);
build_inter_predictors4b(x, &x->block[ 8], 16);
build_inter_predictors4b(x, &x->block[10], 16);
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.second_ref_frame) {
build_2nd_inter_predictors4b(x, &x->block[ 0], 16);
build_2nd_inter_predictors4b(x, &x->block[ 2], 16);
build_2nd_inter_predictors4b(x, &x->block[ 8], 16);
build_2nd_inter_predictors4b(x, &x->block[10], 16);
}
} else {
for (i = 0; i < 16; i += 2) {
BLOCKD *d0 = &x->block[i];
BLOCKD *d1 = &x->block[i + 1];
x->block[i + 0].bmi = x->mode_info_context->bmi[i + 0];
x->block[i + 1].bmi = x->mode_info_context->bmi[i + 1];
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.need_to_clamp_mvs) {
clamp_mv_to_umv_border(&x->block[i + 0].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv, x);
clamp_mv_to_umv_border(&x->block[i + 1].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv, x);
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.second_ref_frame) {
clamp_mv_to_umv_border(&x->block[i + 0].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv, x);
clamp_mv_to_umv_border(&x->block[i + 1].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv, x);
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
}
if (d0->bmi.as_mv.first.as_int == d1->bmi.as_mv.first.as_int)
build_inter_predictors2b(x, d0, 16);
else {
vp8_build_inter_predictors_b(d0, 16, x->subpixel_predict);
vp8_build_inter_predictors_b(d1, 16, x->subpixel_predict);
}
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.second_ref_frame) {
vp8_build_2nd_inter_predictors_b(d0, 16, x->subpixel_predict_avg);
vp8_build_2nd_inter_predictors_b(d1, 16, x->subpixel_predict_avg);
}
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
}
for (i = 16; i < 24; i += 2) {
BLOCKD *d0 = &x->block[i];
BLOCKD *d1 = &x->block[i + 1];
if (d0->bmi.as_mv.first.as_int == d1->bmi.as_mv.first.as_int)
build_inter_predictors2b(x, d0, 8);
else {
vp8_build_inter_predictors_b(d0, 8, x->subpixel_predict);
vp8_build_inter_predictors_b(d1, 8, x->subpixel_predict);
}
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.second_ref_frame) {
vp8_build_2nd_inter_predictors_b(d0, 8, x->subpixel_predict_avg);
vp8_build_2nd_inter_predictors_b(d1, 8, x->subpixel_predict_avg);
}
}
}
static
void build_4x4uvmvs(MACROBLOCKD *x) {
int i, j;
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < 2; j++) {
int yoffset = i * 8 + j * 2;
int uoffset = 16 + i * 2 + j;
int voffset = 20 + i * 2 + j;
int temp;
temp = x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 0].as_mv.first.as_mv.row
+ x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 1].as_mv.first.as_mv.row
+ x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 4].as_mv.first.as_mv.row
+ x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 5].as_mv.first.as_mv.row;
if (temp < 0) temp -= 4;
else temp += 4;
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.row = (temp / 8) & x->fullpixel_mask;
temp = x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 0].as_mv.first.as_mv.col
+ x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 1].as_mv.first.as_mv.col
+ x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 4].as_mv.first.as_mv.col
+ x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 5].as_mv.first.as_mv.col;
if (temp < 0) temp -= 4;
else temp += 4;
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.col = (temp / 8) & x->fullpixel_mask;
// if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.need_to_clamp_mvs)
clamp_uvmv_to_umv_border(&x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv, x);
// if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.need_to_clamp_mvs)
clamp_uvmv_to_umv_border(&x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv, x);
x->block[voffset].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.row =
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.row;
x->block[voffset].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.col =
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.first.as_mv.col;
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.second_ref_frame) {
temp = x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 0].as_mv.second.as_mv.row
+ x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 1].as_mv.second.as_mv.row
+ x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 4].as_mv.second.as_mv.row
+ x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 5].as_mv.second.as_mv.row;
if (temp < 0) {
temp -= 4;
} else {
temp += 4;
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.row = (temp / 8) & x->fullpixel_mask;
temp = x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 0].as_mv.second.as_mv.col
+ x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 1].as_mv.second.as_mv.col
+ x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 4].as_mv.second.as_mv.col
+ x->mode_info_context->bmi[yoffset + 5].as_mv.second.as_mv.col;
if (temp < 0) {
temp -= 4;
} else {
temp += 4;
}
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.col = (temp / 8) & x->fullpixel_mask;
// if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.need_to_clamp_mvs)
clamp_uvmv_to_umv_border(&x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv, x);
// if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.need_to_clamp_mvs)
clamp_uvmv_to_umv_border(&x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv, x);
x->block[voffset].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.row =
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.row;
x->block[voffset].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.col =
x->block[uoffset].bmi.as_mv.second.as_mv.col;
}
}
}
}
void vp8_build_inter_predictors_mb(MACROBLOCKD *x) {
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.mode != SPLITMV) {
vp8_build_inter16x16_predictors_mb(x, x->predictor, &x->predictor[256],
&x->predictor[320], 16, 8);
if (x->mode_info_context->mbmi.second_ref_frame) {
/* 256 = offset of U plane in Y+U+V buffer;
* 320 = offset of V plane in Y+U+V buffer.
* (256=16x16, 320=16x16+8x8). */
vp8_build_2nd_inter16x16_predictors_mb(x, x->predictor,
&x->predictor[256],
&x->predictor[320], 16, 8);
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}
} else {
build_4x4uvmvs(x);
build_inter4x4_predictors_mb(x);
}
2010-05-18 17:58:33 +02:00
}