Andy Polyakov 60fd574cdf Make bn/asm/x86_64-gcc.c gcc4 savvy. +r is likely to be initially
introduced for a reason [like bug in initial gcc port], but proposed
=&r is treated correctly by senior 3.2, so we can assume it's safe now.
PR: 1031
2005-04-03 18:53:29 +00:00
..
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-31 13:57:54 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-31 13:57:54 +00:00
2005-03-31 13:57:54 +00:00
2005-02-06 13:43:02 +00:00
2005-04-01 21:56:15 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2005-03-31 13:57:54 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2000-02-01 02:21:16 +00:00
2005-03-30 13:05:57 +00:00
2004-12-20 13:44:34 +00:00
2001-07-05 10:20:07 +00:00
2003-11-28 13:10:58 +00:00
2003-11-28 13:10:58 +00:00