- Add missing bn_check_top() calls and relocate some others
- Use BN_is_zero() where appropriate
- Remove assert()s that bn_check_top() is already covering
- Simplify the code in places (esp. bn_expand2())
- Only keep ambiguous zero handling if BN_STRICT isn't defined
- Remove some white-space and make some other aesthetic tweaks
the same thing.
Also, I have some stuff on the back-burner related to some BN_CTX notes
from Peter Gutmann about his cryptlib hacks to the bignum code. The BN_CTX
comments are there to remind me of some relevant points in the code.
once in the source (where it is set for the benefit of no other code
whatsoever). I've deprecated the declaration in the header and likewise
made the use of the flag conditional in bn_lib.c. Note, this change also
NULLs the 'd' pointer in a BIGNUM when it is reset but not deallocated.
which, in turn, are used nowhere at all. This is a good thing because
bn_set_max() would currently generate code that wouldn't compile (BIGNUM
has no 'max' element).
The only apparent use for bn_set_[low|high] would be for implementing
windowing algorithms, and all of openssl's seem to use bn_***_words()
helpers instead (including the BN_div() that Nils fixed recently, which had
been using independently-coded versions of what these unused macros are
intended for). I'm therefore consigning these macros to cvs oblivion in the
name of readability.
bn_correct_top() or bn_check_top() depending on debug settings. For
internal source, all bn_fix_top()s should be converted one way or the other
depending on whether the use of bn_correct_top() is justified.
For BN_div_recp(), these cases should not require correction if the other
bignum functions are doing their jobs properly, so convert to
bn_check_top().
(ie. where top may be zero, or it may be one if the corresponding word is
set to zero). Note, this only affects the macros in bn.h, there are probably
similar corrections required in some c files.
Also, clarify the audit-related macros at the top of the header. Mental
note: I must not forget to clean all this out before 0.9.8 is released ...
that gets built before objects barfs all over the place because it
uses a new NID that hasn't had a chance of getting defined yet (in
this case, it was about a couple of new EC curves, and therefore a
couple of new corresponding NIDs).
I'm placing objects first in SDIRS! There.
against inconsistent BIGNUMs coming out of any of its API functions. So
this change no longer "fixes" the bn_print.c functions, but it makes for
cleaner code. This patch was a part of ticket 697.
PR: 697
Submitted by: Otto Moerbeek
Reviewed by: Geoff Thorpe
ticket 697 (though uses a different solution than the proposed one). This
problem was initially raised by Otto Moerbeek.
PR: 697
Submitted by: Nils Larsch
Reviewed by: Geoff Thorpe
and bn_add_words to avoid using fake bignums to window other bignums that
can lead to corruption. This change allows all bignum tests to pass with
BN_DEBUG and BN_DEBUG_RAND debugging and valgrind. NB: This should be
tested on a few different architectures and configuration targets, as the
bignum code this deals with is quite preprocessor (and assembly) sensitive.
Submitted by: Nils Narsch
Reviewed by: Geoff Thorpe, Ulf Moeller
sure the current length is used to calculate the new buffer length instead
of using the old length (prior to any variable substitution).
Submitted by: Nils Larsch
generally a more efficient comparison than comparing two integers, and the
first of these two loops was off-by-one (copying one too many values). This
change also removes a superfluous assignment that would set an unused word
to zero (and potentially allow an overrun in some cases).
Submitted by: Nils Larsch
Reviewed by: Geoff Thorpe
(where it was impossible to create an EC certificate with a compressed
public key), and has some style improvements based on some comments from
Steve Henson about use of the ASN1 macros.
Submitted by: Nils Larsch
Reviewed by: Geoff Thorpe
constant BIGNUMs. It turns out that this trips up different but equally
useful compiler warnings to -Wcast-qual, and so wasn't worth the ugliness
it created. (Thanks to Ulf for the forehead-slap.)
