"Another machine, another version of gcc, another batch
of compiler warnings." Add "=NULL" to some local variable
declarations that are set by passing thier address into a
utility function; confuses GCC it might not be set.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@silkandcyanide.net>
Reduces number of silly casts in OpenSSL code and likely most
applications. Consistent with (char *) for "peername" value from
X509_check_host() and X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get0_peername().
A client reference identity of ".example.com" matches a server
certificate presented identity that is any sub-domain of "example.com"
(e.g. "www.sub.example.com).
With the X509_CHECK_FLAG_SINGLE_LABEL_SUBDOMAINS flag, it matches
only direct child sub-domains (e.g. "www.sub.example.com").
subjectAltName field. The Name Contraint example in x509v3_config(5) even use IP
as an example:
nameConstraints=permitted;IP:192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0
However, until now, the verify code for IP name contraints did not exist. Any
check with a IP Address Name Constraint results in a "unsupported name constraint
type" error.
This patch implements support for IP Address Name Constraint (v4 and v6). This code
validaded correcly certificates with multiple IPv4/IPv6 address checking against
a CA certificate with these constraints:
permitted;IP.1=10.9.0.0/255.255.0.0
permitted;IP.2=10.48.0.0/255.255.0.0
permitted;IP.3=10.148.0.0/255.255.0.0
permitted;IP.4=fdc8:123f:e31f::/ffff:ffff:ffff::
Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@gmail.com>
Not all platforms define BN_ULLONG. Define SCTS_TIMESTAMP as a type
which should work on all platforms.
(cherry picked from commit 6634416732b94627eba1c47de3c3a6321a5458f0)
Contributed by: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Fixes to X509 hostname and email address checking. Wildcard matching support.
New test program and manual page.
PR#1999 broke fork detection by assuming HAVE_FORK was set for all platforms.
Include original HAVE_FORK detection logic while allowing it to be
overridden on specific platforms with -DHAVE_FORK=1 or -DHAVE_FORK=0
as issuer and subject names. Although this is an incompatible change
it should have little impact in pratice because self-issued certificates
that are not self-signed are rarely encountered.
