In X509_cmp, if cert digest is equal, look at DER of the
signed part. This is what master and 1.0.2 already do.
Reviewed-by: Dr. Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
The function int_rsa_verify is an internal function used for verifying an
RSA signature. It takes an argument |dtype| which indicates the digest type
that was used. Dependant on that digest type the processing of the
signature data will vary. In particular if |dtype == NID_mdc2| and the
signature data is a bare OCTETSTRING then it is treated differently to the
default case where the signature data is treated as a DigestInfo (X509_SIG).
Due to a missing "else" keyword the logic actually correctly processes the
OCTETSTRING format signature first, and then attempts to continue and
process it as DigestInfo. This will invariably fail because we already know
that it is a bare OCTETSTRING.
This failure doesn't actualy make a real difference because it ends up at
the |err| label regardless and still returns a "success" result. This patch
just cleans things up to make it look a bit more sane.
RT#4076
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit dffe51091f)
BN_with_flags() will read the dest->flags to keep the BN_FLG_MALLOCED but
overwrites everything else.
Signed-off-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
MR #1231
(cherry picked from commit f92768e6f5)
Thanks to David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> for pointing them out.
Reviewed-by: Steve Henson <steve@openssl.org>
MR #1198
(cherry picked from commit 605236f6a8)
BUF_strndup was calling strlen through BUF_strlcpy, and ended up reading
past the input if the input was not a C string.
Make it explicitly part of BUF_strndup's contract to never read more
than |siz| input bytes. This augments the standard strndup contract to
be safer.
The commit also adds a check for siz overflow and some brief documentation
for BUF_strndup().
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 110f7b37de)
(cherry picked from commit f61216ba9d)
If we use BIO_new_file(), on Windows it'll jump through hoops to work
around their unusual charset/Unicode handling. it'll convert a UTF-8
filename to UCS-16LE and attempt to use _wfopen().
If you use BIO_read_filename(), it doesn't do this. Shouldn't it be
consistent?
It would certainly be nice if SSL_use_certificate_chain_file() worked.
Also made BIO_C_SET_FILENAME work (rsalz)
Signed-off-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit ff03599a2f)
There are a couple of minor fixes here:
1) Handle the case when RegisterEventSource() fails (which it may for
various reasons) and do the work of logging the event only if it succeeds.
2) Handle the case when ReportEvent() fails and do our best in debug builds
to at least attempt somehow indicate that something has gone wrong. The
typical situation would be someone running tools like DbMon, DBWin32,
DebugView or just having the debugger attached. The intent is to make sure
that at least some data will be captured so that we can save hours and days
of debugging time.
3) Minor fix to change the MessageBox() flag to MB_ICONERROR. Though the
value of MB_ICONERROR is the same value as MB_ICONSTOP, the intent is
better conveyed by using MB_ICONERROR.
Testing performed:
1) Clean compilation for debug-VC-WIN32 and VC-WIN32.
2) Good test results (nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak test) for debug-VC-WIN32 and
VC-WIN32.
3) Stepped through relevant changes using WinDBG and exercised the impacted
code paths.
Signed-off-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4cd94416a4)
There were some memory leaks in the creation of an SRP verifier (both on
successful completion and also on some error paths).
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit bf95cde287)
Was only approved for master, to avoid compatibility issues on
previous releases.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 6be18a2219)
In master we have the function OPENSSL_clear_free(x,y), which immediately
returns if x == NULL. In <=1.0.2 this function does not exist so we have to
do:
OPENSSL_cleanse(x, y);
OPENSSL_free(x);
However, previously, OPENSSL_cleanse did not check that if x == NULL, so
the real equivalent check would have to be:
if (x != NULL)
OPENSSL_cleanse(x, y);
OPENSSL_free(x);
It would be easy to get this wrong during cherry-picking to other branches
and therefore, for safety, it is best to just ensure OPENSSL_cleanse also
checks for NULL.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 020d8fc83f)
Previously, the conversion would silently coerce to ASCII. Now, we error
out.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit b785504a10)
(cherry picked from commit cb71f17dc7)
Rewrite EVP_DecodeUpdate.
In particular: reject extra trailing padding, and padding in the middle
of the content. Don't limit line length. Add tests.
Previously, the behaviour was ill-defined, and depended on the position
of the padding within the input.
In addition, this appears to fix a possible two-byte oob read.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dr Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3cdd1e94b1)
(cherry picked from commit 37faf11796)
Fix both the caller to error out on malloc failure, as well as the
eventual callee to handle a NULL gracefully.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
The |z| value should be 0x04 not 0x02
RT#3838
Signed-off-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 91d2728b38)
The NULL cipher case can't actually happen because we have no
EVP_PBE_CTL combinations where cipher_nid is -1 and keygen is
PKCS12_PBE_keyivgen. But make the code more obviously correct.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 394f7b6fcc)
- Pass in the right ciphertext length to ensure we're indeed testing
ciphertext corruption (and not truncation).
- Only test one mutation per byte to not make the test too slow.
- Add a separate test for truncated ciphertexts.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 25d6b3401c)
Slightly modified from the original PR.
Signed-off-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit a7e974c7be)
Don't dereference |d| when |top| is zero. Also test that various BIGNUM methods behave correctly on zero/even inputs.
Follow-up to b11980d79a
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
If the seed value for dsa key generation is too short (< qsize),
return an error. Also update the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit f00a10b897)
The function BN_MONT_CTX_set was assuming that the modulus was non-zero
and therefore that |mod->top| > 0. In an error situation that may not be
the case and could cause a seg fault.
This is a follow on from CVE-2015-1794.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
EC_KEY_set_public_key_affine_coordinates was using some variables that only
apply if OPENSSL_NO_EC2M is not defined.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8d11b7c7ee)
This leaves behind files with names ending with '.iso-8859-1'. These
should be safe to remove. If something went wrong when re-encoding,
there will be some files with names ending with '.utf8' left behind.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
This is a follow up to the alternate chains certificate forgery issue
(CVE-2015-1793). That issue is exacerbated in 1.0.1 by a related bug which
means that we *always* check for an alternative chain, even if we have
already found a chain. The code is supposed to stop as soon as it has found
one (and does do in master and 1.0.2).
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
The function X509_verify_cert checks the value of |ctx->chain| at the
beginning, and if it is NULL then it initialises it, along with the value
of ctx->untrusted. The normal way to use X509_verify_cert() is to first
call X509_STORE_CTX_init(); then set up various parameters etc; then call
X509_verify_cert(); then check the results; and finally call
X509_STORE_CTX_cleanup(). The initial call to X509_STORE_CTX_init() sets
|ctx->chain| to NULL. The only place in the OpenSSL codebase where
|ctx->chain| is set to anything other than a non NULL value is in
X509_verify_cert itself. Therefore the only ways that |ctx->chain| could be
non NULL on entry to X509_verify_cert is if one of the following occurs:
1) An application calls X509_verify_cert() twice without re-initialising
in between.
2) An application reaches inside the X509_STORE_CTX structure and changes
the value of |ctx->chain| directly.
With regards to the second of these, we should discount this - it should
not be supported to allow this.
With regards to the first of these, the documentation is not exactly
crystal clear, but the implication is that you must call
X509_STORE_CTX_init() before each call to X509_verify_cert(). If you fail
to do this then, at best, the results would be undefined.
Calling X509_verify_cert() with |ctx->chain| set to a non NULL value is
likely to have unexpected results, and could be dangerous. This commit
changes the behaviour of X509_verify_cert() so that it causes an error if
|ctx->chain| is anything other than NULL (because this indicates that we
have not been initialised properly). It also clarifies the associated
documentation. This is a follow up commit to CVE-2015-1793.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
This adds a test for CVE-2015-1793. This adds a new test file
verify_extra_test.c, which could form the basis for additional
verification tests.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
Conflicts:
test/Makefile
During certificate verfification, OpenSSL will attempt to find an
alternative certificate chain if the first attempt to build such a chain
fails. An error in the implementation of this logic can mean that an
attacker could cause certain checks on untrusted certificates to be
bypassed, such as the CA flag, enabling them to use a valid leaf
certificate to act as a CA and "issue" an invalid certificate.
This occurs where at least one cert is added to the first chain from the
trust store, but that chain still ends up being untrusted. In that case
ctx->last_untrusted is decremented in error.
Patch provided by the BoringSSL project.
CVE-2015-1793
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
In CCM mode don't require a tag before initialising decrypt: this allows
the tag length to be set without requiring the tag.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 9cca7be11d)
