The function X509_verify_cert checks the value of |ctx->chain| at the
beginning, and if it is NULL then it initialises it, along with the value
of ctx->untrusted. The normal way to use X509_verify_cert() is to first
call X509_STORE_CTX_init(); then set up various parameters etc; then call
X509_verify_cert(); then check the results; and finally call
X509_STORE_CTX_cleanup(). The initial call to X509_STORE_CTX_init() sets
|ctx->chain| to NULL. The only place in the OpenSSL codebase where
|ctx->chain| is set to anything other than a non NULL value is in
X509_verify_cert itself. Therefore the only ways that |ctx->chain| could be
non NULL on entry to X509_verify_cert is if one of the following occurs:
1) An application calls X509_verify_cert() twice without re-initialising
in between.
2) An application reaches inside the X509_STORE_CTX structure and changes
the value of |ctx->chain| directly.
With regards to the second of these, we should discount this - it should
not be supported to allow this.
With regards to the first of these, the documentation is not exactly
crystal clear, but the implication is that you must call
X509_STORE_CTX_init() before each call to X509_verify_cert(). If you fail
to do this then, at best, the results would be undefined.
Calling X509_verify_cert() with |ctx->chain| set to a non NULL value is
likely to have unexpected results, and could be dangerous. This commit
changes the behaviour of X509_verify_cert() so that it causes an error if
|ctx->chain| is anything other than NULL (because this indicates that we
have not been initialised properly). It also clarifies the associated
documentation. This is a follow up commit to CVE-2015-1793.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
This adds a test for CVE-2015-1793. This adds a new test file
verify_extra_test.c, which could form the basis for additional
verification tests.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
During certificate verfification, OpenSSL will attempt to find an
alternative certificate chain if the first attempt to build such a chain
fails. An error in the implementation of this logic can mean that an
attacker could cause certain checks on untrusted certificates to be
bypassed, such as the CA flag, enabling them to use a valid leaf
certificate to act as a CA and "issue" an invalid certificate.
This occurs where at least one cert is added to the first chain from the
trust store, but that chain still ends up being untrusted. In that case
ctx->last_untrusted is decremented in error.
Patch provided by the BoringSSL project.
CVE-2015-1793
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
In CCM mode don't require a tag before initialising decrypt: this allows
the tag length to be set without requiring the tag.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 9cca7be11d62298b2af0722f94345012c86eaed4)
A small rearrangement so the inclusion of rsaz_exp.h would be
unconditional, but what that header defines becomes conditional.
This solves the weirdness where rsaz_exp.h gets in and out of the
dependency list for bn_exp.c, depending on the present architecture.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Construct bio_err and bio_stdout from file handles instead of FILE
pointers, since the latter might not be implemented (when OPENSSL_NO_STDIO
is defined).
Convert all output to use BIO_printf.
Change lh_foo to lh_SSL_SESSION_foo.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit bb8abd6735e198de36c1eb9098a7f1516d156220)
Conflicts:
crypto/threads/mttest.c
Recent HMAC changes broke ABI compatibility due to a new field in HMAC_CTX.
This backs that change out, and does it a different way.
Thanks to Timo Teras for the concept.
Conflicts:
crypto/hmac/hmac.c
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Also tighten X509_cmp_time to reject more than three fractional
seconds in the time; and to reject trailing garbage after the offset.
CVE-2015-1789
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Fix loop in do_free_upto if cmsbio is NULL: this will happen when attempting
to verify and a digest is not recognised. Reported by Johannes Bauer.
CVE-2015-1792
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
In the event of an error in the HMAC function, leaks can occur because the
HMAC_CTX does not get cleaned up.
Thanks to the BoringSSL project for reporting this issue.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit e43a13c807e42688c72c4f3d001112bf0a110464)
The function EC_POINT_is_on_curve does not return a boolean value.
It returns 1 if the point is on the curve, 0 if it is not, and -1
on error. Many usages within OpenSSL were incorrectly using this
function and therefore not correctly handling error conditions.
With thanks to the Open Crypto Audit Project for reporting this issue.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 68886be7e2cd395a759fcd41d2cede461b68843d)
This fixes a memory leak that can occur whilst duplicating a BIO chain if
the call to CRYPTO_dup_ex_data() fails. It also fixes a second memory leak
where if a failure occurs after successfully creating the first BIO in the
chain, then the beginning of the new chain was not freed.
With thanks to the Open Crypto Audit Project for reporting this issue.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
Conflicts:
crypto/bio/bio_lib.c
BUF_MEM_free() attempts to cleanse memory using memset immediately prior
to a free. This is at risk of being optimised away by the compiler, so
replace with a call to OPENSSL_cleanse() instead.
With thanks to the Open Crypto Audit Project for reporting this issue.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
Pointed out by Victor Vasiliev (vasilvv@mit.edu) via Adam Langley
(Google).
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 1e4a355dcabe2f75df5bb8b41b394d37037169d2)
A BIGNUM can have the value of -0. The function BN_bn2hex fails to account
for this and can allocate a buffer one byte too short in the event of -0
being used, leading to a one byte buffer overrun. All usage within the
OpenSSL library is considered safe. Any security risk is considered
negligible.
With thanks to Mateusz Kocielski (LogicalTrust), Marek Kroemeke and
Filip Palian for discovering and reporting this issue.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit c56353071d9849220714d8a556806703771b9269)
Conflicts:
crypto/bn/bn_print.c
Some tool chains (e.g. android) do not define IP_PMTUDISC_PROBE, and so
this build breaks.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 133dce447b259e0bb93076bf5fd0ce475d16910a)
objects.pl only looked for a space to see if the name could be
used as a C identifier. Improve the test to match the real C
rules.
Signed-off-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 591b7aef05b22cba09b179e5787a9bf40dfc9508)
The code in bss_dgram.c checks if IP_MTUDISCOVER is defined, where it
should test for IP_MTU_DISCOVER
RT#3888
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0baaff1a76d4c91b9c1121059be63175454d7b03)
The members of struct timeval on OpenVMS are unsigned. The logic for
calculating timeouts needs adjusting to deal with this.
RT#3862
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit fc52ac9028b9492fb086ba35a3352ea46e03ecfc)
