If content is detached and not binary mode translate the input to
CRLF format. Before this change the input was verified verbatim
which lead to a discrepancy between sign and verify.
SHA512_Transform was initially added rather as tribute to tradition
than for practucal reasons. But use was recently found in ssl/s3_cbc.c
and it turned to be problematic on platforms that don't tolerate
misasligned references to memory and lack assembly subroutine.
Move the IP, email and host checking fields from the public
X509_VERIFY_PARAM structure into an opaque X509_VERIFY_PARAM_ID
structure. By doing this the structure can be modified in future
without risk of breaking any applications.
(cherry picked from commit adc6bd73e3)
Conflicts:
crypto/x509/x509_vpm.c
For consistency with other cases if we are performing
partial chain verification with just one certificate
notify the callback with ok==1.
(cherry picked from commit 852553d9005e13aed7feb986a5d71cb885b994c7)
Some functions such as EVP_VerifyFinal only finalise a copy of the passed
context in case an application wants to digest more data. Doing this when
it is not needed is inefficient and many applications don't require it.
For compatibility the default is to still finalise a copy unless the
flag EVP_MD_CTX_FLAG_FINALISE is set in which case the passed
context is finalised an *no* further data can be digested after
finalisation.
If the oid parameter is set to NULL in X509_add1_trust_object
create an empty list of trusted purposes corresponding to
"no purpose" if trust is checked.
PR: 2809
DTLS/SCTP requires DATA and FORWARD-TSN chunks to be protected with
SCTP-AUTH. It is checked if this has been activated successfully for
the local and remote peer. Due to a bug, however, the
gauth_number_of_chunks field of the authchunks struct is missing on
FreeBSD, and was therefore not considered in the OpenSSL implementation.
This patch sets the corresponding pointer for the check correctly
whether or not this bug is present.
(cherry picked from commit f596e3c491)
This fixes problems in POD list formatting: extra or missing =back
sequences.
doc/ssl/SSL_CTX_set1_curves.pod around line 90: =back without =over
doc/ssl/SSL_CTX_set1_verify_cert_store.pod around line 73: =back without =over
doc/ssl/SSL_CTX_add1_chain_cert.pod around line 82: =back without =over
doc/crypto/evp.pod around line 40: '=item' outside of any '=over'
crypto/des/des.pod around line 184: You forgot a '=back' before '=head1'
PR#3147
