Update CHANGES and NEWS for release
Add details about the latest issues into CHANGES and NEWS ready for the next release. Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
75374adf8a
commit
f26a179abc
43
CHANGES
43
CHANGES
@ -4,6 +4,49 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Changes between 1.0.2e and 1.0.2f [xx XXX xxxx]
|
Changes between 1.0.2e and 1.0.2f [xx XXX xxxx]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*) DH small subgroups
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Historically OpenSSL only ever generated DH parameters based on "safe"
|
||||||
|
primes. More recently (in version 1.0.2) support was provided for
|
||||||
|
generating X9.42 style parameter files such as those required for RFC 5114
|
||||||
|
support. The primes used in such files may not be "safe". Where an
|
||||||
|
application is using DH configured with parameters based on primes that are
|
||||||
|
not "safe" then an attacker could use this fact to find a peer's private
|
||||||
|
DH exponent. This attack requires that the attacker complete multiple
|
||||||
|
handshakes in which the peer uses the same private DH exponent. For example
|
||||||
|
this could be used to discover a TLS server's private DH exponent if it's
|
||||||
|
reusing the private DH exponent or it's using a static DH ciphersuite.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
OpenSSL provides the option SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE for ephemeral DH (DHE) in
|
||||||
|
TLS. It is not on by default. If the option is not set then the server
|
||||||
|
reuses the same private DH exponent for the life of the server process and
|
||||||
|
would be vulnerable to this attack. It is believed that many popular
|
||||||
|
applications do set this option and would therefore not be at risk.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The fix for this issue adds an additional check where a "q" parameter is
|
||||||
|
available (as is the case in X9.42 based parameters). This detects the
|
||||||
|
only known attack, and is the only possible defense for static DH
|
||||||
|
ciphersuites. This could have some performance impact.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Additionally the SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE option has been switched on by
|
||||||
|
default and cannot be disabled. This could have some performance impact.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This issue was reported to OpenSSL by Antonio Sanso (Adobe).
|
||||||
|
(CVE-2016-0701)
|
||||||
|
[Matt Caswell]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*) SSLv2 doesn't block disabled ciphers
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A malicious client can negotiate SSLv2 ciphers that have been disabled on
|
||||||
|
the server and complete SSLv2 handshakes even if all SSLv2 ciphers have
|
||||||
|
been disabled, provided that the SSLv2 protocol was not also disabled via
|
||||||
|
SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 26th December 2015 by Nimrod Aviram
|
||||||
|
and Sebastian Schinzel.
|
||||||
|
(CVE-2015-3197)
|
||||||
|
[Viktor Dukhovni]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*) Reject DH handshakes with parameters shorter than 1024 bits.
|
*) Reject DH handshakes with parameters shorter than 1024 bits.
|
||||||
[Kurt Roeckx]
|
[Kurt Roeckx]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3
NEWS
3
NEWS
@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.0.2e and OpenSSL 1.0.2f [under development]
|
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.0.2e and OpenSSL 1.0.2f [under development]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
o
|
o DH small subgroups (CVE-2016-0701)
|
||||||
|
o SSLv2 doesn't block disabled ciphers (CVE-2015-3197)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.0.2d and OpenSSL 1.0.2e [3 Dec 2015]
|
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.0.2d and OpenSSL 1.0.2e [3 Dec 2015]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user