When the underlying BIO_write() fails to send a datagram, we leave the
offending record queued as 'pending'. The DTLS code doesn't expect this, and we end up hitting an OPENSSL_assert() in do_dtls1_write(). The simple fix is just _not_ to leave it queued. In DTLS, dropping packets is perfectly acceptable -- and even preferable. If we wanted a service with retries and guaranteed delivery, we'd be using TCP. PR: #1703 Submitted by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cfe04f607d
commit
ab073bad4f
@ -753,8 +753,15 @@ int ssl3_write_pending(SSL *s, int type, const unsigned char *buf,
|
||||
s->rwstate=SSL_NOTHING;
|
||||
return(s->s3->wpend_ret);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (i <= 0)
|
||||
else if (i <= 0) {
|
||||
if (s->version == DTLS1_VERSION ||
|
||||
s->version == DTLS1_BAD_VER) {
|
||||
/* For DTLS, just drop it. That's kind of the whole
|
||||
point in using a datagram service */
|
||||
s->s3->wbuf.left = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return(i);
|
||||
}
|
||||
s->s3->wbuf.offset+=i;
|
||||
s->s3->wbuf.left-=i;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user