When the underlying BIO_write() fails to send a datagram, we leave the

offending record queued as 'pending'. The DTLS code doesn't expect this,
and we end up hitting an OPENSSL_assert() in do_dtls1_write().

The simple fix is just _not_ to leave it queued. In DTLS, dropping
packets is perfectly acceptable -- and even preferable. If we wanted a
service with retries and guaranteed delivery, we'd be using TCP.
PR: #1703
Submitted by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
This commit is contained in:
Lutz Jänicke 2008-10-10 10:41:32 +00:00
parent cfe04f607d
commit ab073bad4f

View File

@ -753,8 +753,15 @@ int ssl3_write_pending(SSL *s, int type, const unsigned char *buf,
s->rwstate=SSL_NOTHING;
return(s->s3->wpend_ret);
}
else if (i <= 0)
else if (i <= 0) {
if (s->version == DTLS1_VERSION ||
s->version == DTLS1_BAD_VER) {
/* For DTLS, just drop it. That's kind of the whole
point in using a datagram service */
s->s3->wbuf.left = 0;
}
return(i);
}
s->s3->wbuf.offset+=i;
s->s3->wbuf.left-=i;
}