generic-library/openssl
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Fix typos in wp-mmx.pl.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Andy Polyakov 2005-11-30 20:52:27 +00:00
parent c173d09c56
commit a3344c8e5e
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
crypto/whrlpool/asm/wp-mmx.pl
View File

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
# #
# (*) I've sketched even non-MMX assembler, but for the record # (*) I've sketched even non-MMX assembler, but for the record
# I've failed to beat the Intel compiler on P4, without using # I've failed to beat the Intel compiler on P4, without using
* MMX that is... # MMX that is...
# (**) ... on AMD on the other hand non-MMX assembler was observed # (**) ... on AMD on the other hand non-MMX assembler was observed
# to perform significantly better, but I figured this MMX # to perform significantly better, but I figured this MMX
# implementation is even faster anyway, so why bother? As for # implementation is even faster anyway, so why bother? As for
@ -106,9 +106,9 @@ $tbl="ebp";
for($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { &movq(@mm[$i],&QWP($i*8,"esi")); } # L=H for($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { &movq(@mm[$i],&QWP($i*8,"esi")); } # L=H
&set_label("outerloop"); &set_label("outerloop");
for($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { &movq(&QWP($i*8,"esp"),@mm[$i]); } # K=H for($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { &movq(&QWP($i*8,"esp"),@mm[$i]); } # K=L
for($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { &pxor(@mm[$i],&QWP($i*8,"edi")); } # L^=inp for($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { &pxor(@mm[$i],&QWP($i*8,"edi")); } # L^=inp
for($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { &movq(&QWP(64+$i*8,"esp"),@mm[$i]); } #S=L for($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { &movq(&QWP(64+$i*8,"esp"),@mm[$i]); } # S=L
&xor ("esi","esi"); &xor ("esi","esi");
&mov (&DWP(12,"ebx"),"esi"); # zero round counter &mov (&DWP(12,"ebx"),"esi"); # zero round counter