reword RI description
This commit is contained in:
parent
c2963f5b87
commit
9fb6fd34f8
@ -678,6 +678,7 @@ typedef struct st_dynamic_fns {
|
|||||||
* can be fully instantiated with IMPLEMENT_DYNAMIC_CHECK_FN(). */
|
* can be fully instantiated with IMPLEMENT_DYNAMIC_CHECK_FN(). */
|
||||||
typedef unsigned long (*dynamic_v_check_fn)(unsigned long ossl_version);
|
typedef unsigned long (*dynamic_v_check_fn)(unsigned long ossl_version);
|
||||||
#define IMPLEMENT_DYNAMIC_CHECK_FN() \
|
#define IMPLEMENT_DYNAMIC_CHECK_FN() \
|
||||||
|
OPENSSL_EXPORT unsigned long v_check(unsigned long v); \
|
||||||
OPENSSL_EXPORT unsigned long v_check(unsigned long v) { \
|
OPENSSL_EXPORT unsigned long v_check(unsigned long v) { \
|
||||||
if(v >= OSSL_DYNAMIC_OLDEST) return OSSL_DYNAMIC_VERSION; \
|
if(v >= OSSL_DYNAMIC_OLDEST) return OSSL_DYNAMIC_VERSION; \
|
||||||
return 0; }
|
return 0; }
|
||||||
@ -700,6 +701,8 @@ typedef unsigned long (*dynamic_v_check_fn)(unsigned long ossl_version);
|
|||||||
typedef int (*dynamic_bind_engine)(ENGINE *e, const char *id,
|
typedef int (*dynamic_bind_engine)(ENGINE *e, const char *id,
|
||||||
const dynamic_fns *fns);
|
const dynamic_fns *fns);
|
||||||
#define IMPLEMENT_DYNAMIC_BIND_FN(fn) \
|
#define IMPLEMENT_DYNAMIC_BIND_FN(fn) \
|
||||||
|
OPENSSL_EXPORT \
|
||||||
|
int bind_engine(ENGINE *e, const char *id, const dynamic_fns *fns);
|
||||||
OPENSSL_EXPORT \
|
OPENSSL_EXPORT \
|
||||||
int bind_engine(ENGINE *e, const char *id, const dynamic_fns *fns) { \
|
int bind_engine(ENGINE *e, const char *id, const dynamic_fns *fns) { \
|
||||||
if(ENGINE_get_static_state() == fns->static_state) goto skip_cbs; \
|
if(ENGINE_get_static_state() == fns->static_state) goto skip_cbs; \
|
||||||
|
@ -237,24 +237,30 @@ OpenSSL 0.9.8m and later always attempts to use secure renegotiation as
|
|||||||
described in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (FIXME: replace by RFC). This
|
described in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (FIXME: replace by RFC). This
|
||||||
counters the prefix attack described in CVE-2009-3555 and elsewhere.
|
counters the prefix attack described in CVE-2009-3555 and elsewhere.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The deprecated and highly broken SSLv2 protocol does not support secure
|
||||||
|
renegotiation at all: its use is B<strongly> discouraged.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This attack has far reaching consequences which application writers should be
|
This attack has far reaching consequences which application writers should be
|
||||||
aware of. In the description below an implementation supporting secure
|
aware of. In the description below an implementation supporting secure
|
||||||
renegotiation is referred to as I<patched>. A server not supporting secure
|
renegotiation is referred to as I<patched>. A server not supporting secure
|
||||||
renegotiation is referred to as I<unpatched>.
|
renegotiation is referred to as I<unpatched>.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The following sections describe the operations permitted by OpenSSL's secure
|
||||||
|
renegotiation implementation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
=head2 Patched client and server
|
=head2 Patched client and server
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Connections and renegotiation will always succeed.
|
Connections and renegotiation are always permitted by OpenSSL implementations.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
=head2 Unpatched client and patched server
|
=head2 Unpatched client and patched OpenSSL server
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The initial connection suceeds but client renegotiation is denied with a
|
The initial connection suceeds but client renegotiation is denied by the
|
||||||
B<no_renegotiation> warning alert if TLS v1.0 is used or a fatal
|
server with a B<no_renegotiation> warning alert if TLS v1.0 is used or a fatal
|
||||||
B<handshake_failure> alert in SSL v3.0.
|
B<handshake_failure> alert in SSL v3.0.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If the patched server attempts to renegotiate a fatal B<handshake_failure>
|
If the patched OpenSSL server attempts to renegotiate a fatal
|
||||||
alert is sent. This is because the server code may be unaware of the
|
B<handshake_failure> alert is sent. This is because the server code may be
|
||||||
unpatched nature of the client.
|
unaware of the unpatched nature of the client.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If the option B<SSL_OP_ALLOW_UNSAFE_LEGACY_RENEGOTIATION> is set then
|
If the option B<SSL_OP_ALLOW_UNSAFE_LEGACY_RENEGOTIATION> is set then
|
||||||
renegotiation B<always> succeeds.
|
renegotiation B<always> succeeds.
|
||||||
@ -263,32 +269,33 @@ B<NB:> a bug in OpenSSL clients earlier than 0.9.8m (all of which are
|
|||||||
unpatched) will result in the connection hanging if it receives a
|
unpatched) will result in the connection hanging if it receives a
|
||||||
B<no_renegotiation> alert. OpenSSL versions 0.9.8m and later will regard
|
B<no_renegotiation> alert. OpenSSL versions 0.9.8m and later will regard
|
||||||
a B<no_renegotiation> alert as fatal and respond with a fatal
|
a B<no_renegotiation> alert as fatal and respond with a fatal
|
||||||
B<handshake_failure> alert.
|
B<handshake_failure> alert. This is because the OpenSSL API currently has
|
||||||
|
no provision to indicate to an application that a renegotiation attempt
|
||||||
|
was refused.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
=head2 Patched client and unpatched server.
|
=head2 Patched OpenSSL client and unpatched server.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If the option B<SSL_OP_LEGACY_SERVER_CONNECT> is set then initial connections
|
If the option B<SSL_OP_LEGACY_SERVER_CONNECT> is set then initial connections
|
||||||
to unpatched servers succeed. This option is currently set by default even
|
between patched OpenSSL clients and unpatched servers succeed. This option
|
||||||
though it has security implications: otherwise it would be impossible to
|
is currently set by default even though it has security implications: otherwise
|
||||||
connect to unpatched servers i.e. all of them initially and this is clearly not
|
it would be impossible to connect to unpatched servers (i.e. all of them
|
||||||
acceptable.
|
initially) and this is clearly not acceptable.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As more servers become patched the option B<SSL_OP_LEGACY_SERVER_CONNECT> will
|
As more servers become patched the option B<SSL_OP_LEGACY_SERVER_CONNECT> will
|
||||||
B<not> be set by default in a future version of OpenSSL.
|
B<not> be set by default in a future version of OpenSSL.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Applications that want to ensure they can connect to unpatched servers should
|
OpenSSL client applications wishing to ensure they can connect to unpatched
|
||||||
always B<set> B<SSL_OP_LEGACY_SERVER_CONNECT>
|
servers should always B<set> B<SSL_OP_LEGACY_SERVER_CONNECT>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Applications that want to ensure they can B<not> connect to unpatched servers
|
OpenSSL client applications that want to ensure they can B<not> connect to
|
||||||
(and thus avoid any security issues) should always B<clear>
|
unpatched servers (and thus avoid any security issues) should always B<clear>
|
||||||
B<SSL_OP_LEGACY_SERVER_CONNECT> using SSL_CTX_clear_options() or
|
B<SSL_OP_LEGACY_SERVER_CONNECT> using SSL_CTX_clear_options() or
|
||||||
SSL_clear_options().
|
SSL_clear_options().
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The function SSL_get_secure_renegotiation_support() indicates whether the peer
|
Renegotiation between a patched OpenSSL client and unpatched server follows
|
||||||
supports secure renegotiation.
|
the same scheme as between an unpatched client and a patched OpenSSL server:
|
||||||
|
i.e. it is not permitted unless the option
|
||||||
The deprecated and highly broken SSLv2 protocol does not support secure
|
B<SSL_OP_ALLOW_UNSAFE_LEGACY_RENEGOTIATION> is set.
|
||||||
renegotiation at all: its use is B<strongly> discouraged.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
=head1 RETURN VALUES
|
=head1 RETURN VALUES
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user