When the underlying BIO_write() fails to send a datagram, we leave the
offending record queued as 'pending'. The DTLS code doesn't expect this, and we end up hitting an OPENSSL_assert() in do_dtls1_write(). The simple fix is just _not_ to leave it queued. In DTLS, dropping packets is perfectly acceptable -- and even preferable. If we wanted a service with retries and guaranteed delivery, we'd be using TCP. PR: #1703 Submitted by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
87d3a0cd90
commit
7e7af0bc51
10
ssl/s3_pkt.c
10
ssl/s3_pkt.c
@ -828,8 +828,16 @@ int ssl3_write_pending(SSL *s, int type, const unsigned char *buf,
|
||||
s->rwstate=SSL_NOTHING;
|
||||
return(s->s3->wpend_ret);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (i <= 0)
|
||||
else if (i <= 0) {
|
||||
if (s->version == DTLS1_VERSION ||
|
||||
s->version == DTLS1_BAD_VER) {
|
||||
/* For DTLS, just drop it. That's kind of the wh
|
||||
ole
|
||||
point in using a datagram service */
|
||||
wb->left = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return(i);
|
||||
}
|
||||
wb->offset+=i;
|
||||
wb->left-=i;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user