Submitted by: Damien Miller <djm@mindrot.org>
Approved by: steve@openssl.org

Fix various typos.
This commit is contained in:
Dr. Stephen Henson
2009-02-14 21:50:14 +00:00
parent eca7b90771
commit 72f6453c48
15 changed files with 17 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ ASN1_STRING *d2i_ASN1_type_bytes(ASN1_STRING **a, const unsigned char **pp,
if (tag >= 32)
{
i=ASN1_R_TAG_VALUE_TOO_HIGH;;
i=ASN1_R_TAG_VALUE_TOO_HIGH;
goto err;
}
if (!(ASN1_tag2bit(tag) & type))

View File

@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ int X509_signature_print(BIO *bp, X509_ALGOR *sigalg, ASN1_STRING *sig)
int ASN1_STRING_print(BIO *bp, ASN1_STRING *v)
{
int i,n;
char buf[80],*p;;
char buf[80],*p;
if (v == NULL) return(0);
n=0;

View File

@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ int test_mod_exp(BIO *bp, BN_CTX *ctx)
BN_bntest_rand(b,2+i,0,0); /**/
if (!BN_mod_exp(d,a,b,c,ctx))
return(00);
return(0);
if (bp != NULL)
{
@@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ int test_exp(BIO *bp, BN_CTX *ctx)
BN_bntest_rand(b,2+i,0,0); /**/
if (!BN_exp(d,a,b,ctx))
return(00);
return(0);
if (bp != NULL)
{

View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ solaris 2.5.1 usparc 167mhz?? - SC4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5
For the ultra sparc, SunC 4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5, running 'des_opts'
gives a speed of 475,000 des/s while 'speed' gives 417,000 des/s.
I belive the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler
I believe the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler
is able to perform when the code is 'inlined'. For 'speed', the DES
routines are being linked from a library. I'll record the higher
speed since if performance is everything, you can always inline

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~bosselae/ripemd160.html
This is my implementation of RIPEMD-160. The pentium assember is a little
off the pace since I only get 1050 cycles, while the best is 1013.
I have a few ideas for how to get another 20 or so cycles, but at
this point I will not bother right now. I belive the trick will be
this point I will not bother right now. I believe the trick will be
to remove my 'copy X array onto stack' until inside the RIP1() finctions the
first time round. To do this I need another register and will only have one
temporary one. A bit tricky.... I can also cleanup the saving of the 5 words

View File

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ int X509V3_add_value(const char *name, const char *value,
CONF_VALUE *vtmp = NULL;
char *tname = NULL, *tvalue = NULL;
if(name && !(tname = BUF_strdup(name))) goto err;
if(value && !(tvalue = BUF_strdup(value))) goto err;;
if(value && !(tvalue = BUF_strdup(value))) goto err;
if(!(vtmp = (CONF_VALUE *)OPENSSL_malloc(sizeof(CONF_VALUE)))) goto err;
if(!*extlist && !(*extlist = sk_CONF_VALUE_new_null())) goto err;
vtmp->section = NULL;