generic-library/openssl
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Increase boundaries in EC_window_bits_for_scalar_size table.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Bodo Möller 2001-03-20 11:16:12 +00:00
parent 37cdcb4d8a
commit 26fbabf3d1
1 changed files with 17 additions and 14 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

31
crypto/ec/ec_mult.c
View File

@ -64,10 +64,10 @@
#define EC_window_bits_for_scalar_size(b) \ #define EC_window_bits_for_scalar_size(b) \
((b) >= 1500 ? 6 : \ ((b) >= 2000 ? 6 : \
(b) >= 550 ? 5 : \ (b) >= 800 ? 5 : \
(b) >= 200 ? 4 : \ (b) >= 300 ? 4 : \
(b) >= 55 ? 3 : \ (b) >= 70 ? 3 : \
(b) >= 20 ? 2 : \ (b) >= 20 ? 2 : \
1) 1)
/* For window size 'w' (w >= 2), we compute the odd multiples /* For window size 'w' (w >= 2), we compute the odd multiples
@ -126,17 +126,20 @@
* w = 1 if 12 >= b * w = 1 if 12 >= b
* *
* Note that neither table tries to take into account memory usage * Note that neither table tries to take into account memory usage
* (code locality etc.). Actual timings with NIST curve P-192 and * (allocation overhead, code locality etc.). Actual timings with
* 192-bit scalars show that w = 3 (instead of 4) is preferrable; * NIST curves P-192, P-224, and P-256 with scalars of 192, 224,
* and timings with NIST curve P-521 and 521-bit scalars show that * and 256 bits, respectively, show that w = 3 (instead of 4) is
* w = 4 (instead of 5) is preferrable. So we round up all the * preferrable; timings with NIST curve P-384 and 384-bit scalars
* confirm that w = 4 is optimal for this case; and timings with
* NIST curve P-521 and 521-bit scalars show that w = 4 (instead
* of 5) is preferrable. So we generously round up all the
* boundaries and use the following table: * boundaries and use the following table:
* *
* w >= 6 if b >= 1500 * w >= 6 if b >= 2000
* w = 5 if 1499 >= b >= 550 * w = 5 if 1999 >= b >= 800
* w = 4 if 549 >= b >= 200 * w = 4 if 799 >= b >= 300
* w = 3 if 199 >= b >= 55 * w = 3 if 299 >= b >= 70
* w = 2 if 54 >= b >= 20 * w = 2 if 69 >= b >= 20
* w = 1 if 19 >= b * w = 1 if 19 >= b
*/ */
@ -282,7 +285,7 @@ int EC_POINTs_mul(const EC_GROUP *group, EC_POINT *r, const BIGNUM *scalar,
} }
} }
#if 1 /* optional, maybe we should only do this if total_num > 1 */ #if 1 /* optional; EC_window_bits_for_scalar_size assumes we do this step */
if (!EC_POINTs_make_affine(group, num_val, val, ctx)) goto err; if (!EC_POINTs_make_affine(group, num_val, val, ctx)) goto err;
#endif #endif