generic-library/openssl
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

use consistent FAQ between version

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Dr. Stephen Henson 2010-12-02 00:11:32 +00:00
parent 2c6d83354d
commit 263979a2a3
1 changed files with 47 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

51
FAQ
View File

@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ OpenSSL - Frequently Asked Questions
* Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail in sha512t on x86 CPU? * Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail in sha512t on x86 CPU?
* Why does compiler fail to compile sha512.c? * Why does compiler fail to compile sha512.c?
* Test suite still fails, what to do? * Test suite still fails, what to do?
* I think I've found a bug, what should I do?
* I'm SURE I've found a bug, how do I report it?
* I've found a security issue, how do I report it?
[PROG] Questions about programming with OpenSSL [PROG] Questions about programming with OpenSSL
@ -131,7 +134,7 @@ OpenSSL. Information on the OpenSSL mailing lists is available from
* Where can I get a compiled version of OpenSSL? * Where can I get a compiled version of OpenSSL?
You can finder pointers to binary distributions in You can finder pointers to binary distributions in
http://www.openssl.org/related/binaries.html . <URL: http://www.openssl.org/related/binaries.html> .
Some applications that use OpenSSL are distributed in binary form. Some applications that use OpenSSL are distributed in binary form.
When using such an application, you don't need to install OpenSSL When using such an application, you don't need to install OpenSSL
@ -463,7 +466,7 @@ administrators.
Other projects do have other policies so you can for example extract the CA Other projects do have other policies so you can for example extract the CA
bundle used by Mozilla and/or modssl as described in this article: bundle used by Mozilla and/or modssl as described in this article:
http://www.mail-archive.com/modssl-users@modssl.org/msg16980.html <URL: http://www.mail-archive.com/modssl-users@modssl.org/msg16980.html>
[BUILD] ======================================================================= [BUILD] =======================================================================
@ -505,7 +508,7 @@ when you run the test suite (using "make test"). The message returned is
"bc: 1 not implemented". "bc: 1 not implemented".
The best way to deal with this is to find another implementation of bc The best way to deal with this is to find another implementation of bc
and compile/install it. GNU bc (see http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html and compile/install it. GNU bc (see <URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html>
for download instructions) can be safely used, for example. for download instructions) can be safely used, for example.
@ -516,7 +519,7 @@ that the OpenSSL bntest throws at it. This gets triggered when you run the
test suite (using "make test"). The message returned is "bc: stack empty". test suite (using "make test"). The message returned is "bc: stack empty".
The best way to deal with this is to find another implementation of bc The best way to deal with this is to find another implementation of bc
and compile/install it. GNU bc (see http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html and compile/install it. GNU bc (see <URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html>
for download instructions) can be safely used, for example. for download instructions) can be safely used, for example.
@ -709,6 +712,46 @@ never make sense, and tend to emerge when you least expect them. In order
to identify one, drop optimization level, e.g. by editing CFLAG line in to identify one, drop optimization level, e.g. by editing CFLAG line in
top-level Makefile, recompile and re-run the test. top-level Makefile, recompile and re-run the test.
* I think I've found a bug, what should I do?
If you are a new user then it is quite likely you haven't found a bug and
something is happening you aren't familiar with. Check this FAQ, the associated
documentation and the mailing lists for similar queries. If you are still
unsure whether it is a bug or not submit a query to the openssl-users mailing
list.
* I'm SURE I've found a bug, how do I report it?
Bug reports with no security implications should be sent to the request
tracker. This can be done by mailing the report to <rt@openssl.org> (or its
alias <openssl-bugs@openssl.org>), please note that messages sent to the
request tracker also appear in the public openssl-dev mailing list.
The report should be in plain text. Any patches should be sent as
plain text attachments because some mailers corrupt patches sent inline.
If your issue affects multiple versions of OpenSSL check any patches apply
cleanly and, if possible include patches to each affected version.
The report should be given a meaningful subject line briefly summarising the
issue. Just "bug in OpenSSL" or "bug in OpenSSL 0.9.8n" is not very helpful.
By sending reports to the request tracker the bug can then be given a priority
and assigned to the appropriate maintainer. The history of discussions can be
accessed and if the issue has been addressed or a reason why not. If patches
are only sent to openssl-dev they can be mislaid if a team member has to
wade through months of old messages to review the discussion.
See also <URL: http://www.openssl.org/support/rt.html>
* I've found a security issue, how do I report it?
If you think your bug has security implications then please send it to
openssl-security@openssl.org if you don't get a prompt reply at least
acknowledging receipt then resend or mail it directly to one of the
more active team members (e.g. Steve).
[PROG] ======================================================================== [PROG] ========================================================================
* Is OpenSSL thread-safe? * Is OpenSSL thread-safe?