Don't declare 2 WARNINGS sections
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
This commit is contained in:
parent
b1697f189b
commit
1f30946481
@ -517,18 +517,6 @@ A sample configuration file with the relevant sections for B<ca>:
|
||||
commonName = supplied
|
||||
emailAddress = optional
|
||||
|
||||
=head1 WARNINGS
|
||||
|
||||
The B<ca> command is quirky and at times downright unfriendly.
|
||||
|
||||
The B<ca> utility was originally meant as an example of how to do things
|
||||
in a CA. It was not supposed to be used as a full blown CA itself:
|
||||
nevertheless some people are using it for this purpose.
|
||||
|
||||
The B<ca> command is effectively a single user command: no locking is
|
||||
done on the various files and attempts to run more than one B<ca> command
|
||||
on the same database can have unpredictable results.
|
||||
|
||||
=head1 FILES
|
||||
|
||||
Note: the location of all files can change either by compile time options,
|
||||
@ -593,6 +581,16 @@ create an empty file.
|
||||
|
||||
=head1 WARNINGS
|
||||
|
||||
The B<ca> command is quirky and at times downright unfriendly.
|
||||
|
||||
The B<ca> utility was originally meant as an example of how to do things
|
||||
in a CA. It was not supposed to be used as a full blown CA itself:
|
||||
nevertheless some people are using it for this purpose.
|
||||
|
||||
The B<ca> command is effectively a single user command: no locking is
|
||||
done on the various files and attempts to run more than one B<ca> command
|
||||
on the same database can have unpredictable results.
|
||||
|
||||
The B<copy_extensions> option should be used with caution. If care is
|
||||
not taken then it can be a security risk. For example if a certificate
|
||||
request contains a basicConstraints extension with CA:TRUE and the
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user