UltraSPARC performance "tune-up."
This commit is contained in:
parent
4b8e01a22f
commit
0c78046356
8
PROBLEMS
8
PROBLEMS
@ -62,3 +62,11 @@ What happens is that gcc might optimize a little too agressively, and
|
||||
you end up with an extra incrementation when *header != '4'.
|
||||
|
||||
We recommend that you upgrade gcc to as high a 3.x version as you can.
|
||||
|
||||
* solaris64-sparcv9-cc SHA-1 performance with WorkShop 6 compiler.
|
||||
|
||||
As subject suggests SHA-1 might perform poorly (4 times slower)
|
||||
if compiled with WorkShop 6 compiler and -xarch=v9. The cause for
|
||||
this seems to be the fact that compiler emits multiplication to
|
||||
perform shift operations:-( To work the problem around configure
|
||||
with './Configure solaris64-sparcv9-cc -DMD32_REG_T=int'.
|
||||
|
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
|
||||
#ifdef MD5_ASM
|
||||
# if defined(__i386) || defined(__i386__) || defined(_M_IX86) || defined(__INTEL__)
|
||||
# define md5_block_host_order md5_block_asm_host_order
|
||||
# elif defined(__sparc) && defined(OPENSSL_SYS_ULTRASPARC)
|
||||
# elif defined(__sparc) && defined(OPENSSL_SYSNAME_ULTRASPARC)
|
||||
void md5_block_asm_data_order_aligned (MD5_CTX *c, const MD5_LONG *p,int num);
|
||||
# define HASH_BLOCK_DATA_ORDER_ALIGNED md5_block_asm_data_order_aligned
|
||||
# endif
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user