fix SM_FIXEDSLCNUM_SLICE bug, add SM_AUTO_SLICE mode

This commit is contained in:
ruil2
2014-03-11 10:23:46 +08:00
parent ca457f57e9
commit 7c8ce799c0
9 changed files with 28 additions and 24 deletions

View File

@@ -226,7 +226,8 @@ int32_t ParamValidationExt (sWelsEncCtx*pCtx,SWelsSvcCodingParam* pCodingParam)
fDlp->sSliceCfg.sSliceArgument.uiSliceMbNum[iIdx] = 0;
}
break;
case SM_FIXEDSLCNUM_SLICE: {
case SM_FIXEDSLCNUM_SLICE:
case SM_AUTO_SLICE:{
fDlp->sSliceCfg.sSliceArgument.uiSliceSizeConstraint = 0;
iMbWidth = (kiPicWidth + 15) >> 4;
@@ -1690,14 +1691,7 @@ int32_t InitSliceSettings (SWelsSvcCodingParam* pCodingParam, const int32_t kiCp
const int32_t kiMbWidth = (pDlp->iFrameWidth + 15) >> 4;
const int32_t kiMbHeight = (pDlp->iFrameHeight + 15) >> 4;
const int32_t kiMbNumInFrame = kiMbWidth * kiMbHeight;
#if defined(MT_ENABLED)
int32_t iSliceNum = (SM_FIXEDSLCNUM_SLICE == pMso->uiSliceMode
|| SM_DYN_SLICE == pMso->uiSliceMode) ? kiCpuCores :
pSlcArg->uiSliceNum; // uiSliceNum per input has been validated at ParamValidationExt()
#else//!MT_ENABLED
int16_t iSliceNum = pSlcArg->uiSliceNum; // uiSliceNum per input has been validated at ParamValidationExt()
#endif//MT_ENABLED
int32_t iSliceNum = (SM_AUTO_SLICE == pMso->uiSliceMode)? kiCpuCores :pSlcArg->uiSliceNum;
// NOTE: Per design, in case MT/DYNAMIC_SLICE_ASSIGN enabled, for SM_FIXEDSLCNUM_SLICE mode,
// uiSliceNum of current spatial layer settings equals to uiCpuCores number; SM_DYN_SLICE mode,
// uiSliceNum intials as uiCpuCores also, stay tuned dynamically slicing in future
@@ -1710,6 +1704,7 @@ int32_t InitSliceSettings (SWelsSvcCodingParam* pCodingParam, const int32_t kiCp
break; // go through for MT_ENABLED & SM_DYN_SLICE?
//#endif//MT_ENABLED
case SM_FIXEDSLCNUM_SLICE:
case SM_AUTO_SLICE:
if (iSliceNum > iMaxSliceCount)
iMaxSliceCount = iSliceNum;
// need perform check due uiSliceNum might change, although has been initialized somewhere outside
@@ -2950,7 +2945,8 @@ int32_t WelsEncoderEncodeExt (sWelsEncCtx* pCtx, SFrameBSInfo * pFbi, const SSou
// Encoding this picture might mulitiple sQualityStat layers potentially be encoded as followed
switch (param_d->sSliceCfg.uiSliceMode) {
case SM_FIXEDSLCNUM_SLICE: {
case SM_FIXEDSLCNUM_SLICE:
case SM_AUTO_SLICE:{
#if defined(MT_ENABLED)
if ((iCurDid > 0) && (pSvcParam->iMultipleThreadIdc > 1) &&
(pSvcParam->sDependencyLayers[iCurDid].sSliceCfg.uiSliceMode == SM_FIXEDSLCNUM_SLICE
@@ -3403,7 +3399,7 @@ int32_t WelsEncoderEncodeExt (sWelsEncCtx* pCtx, SFrameBSInfo * pFbi, const SSou
}
#if defined(MT_ENABLED)
if (param_d->sSliceCfg.uiSliceMode == SM_FIXEDSLCNUM_SLICE && pSvcParam->iMultipleThreadIdc > 1 &&
if ((param_d->sSliceCfg.uiSliceMode == SM_FIXEDSLCNUM_SLICE||param_d->sSliceCfg.uiSliceMode == SM_AUTO_SLICE) && pSvcParam->iMultipleThreadIdc > 1 &&
pSvcParam->iMultipleThreadIdc >= param_d->sSliceCfg.sSliceArgument.uiSliceNum) {
CalcSliceComplexRatio (pCtx->pSliceThreading->pSliceComplexRatio[iCurDid], pCtx->pCurDqLayer->pSliceEncCtx,
pCtx->pSliceThreading->pSliceConsumeTime[iCurDid]);
@@ -3444,9 +3440,9 @@ int32_t WelsEncoderEncodeExt (sWelsEncCtx* pCtx, SFrameBSInfo * pFbi, const SSou
#if defined(MT_ENABLED)
if (pSvcParam->iMultipleThreadIdc > 1 && did_list[0] == BASE_DEPENDENCY_ID
&& pSvcParam->sDependencyLayers[0].sSliceCfg.uiSliceMode == SM_FIXEDSLCNUM_SLICE
&& ((pSvcParam->sDependencyLayers[0].sSliceCfg.uiSliceMode == SM_FIXEDSLCNUM_SLICE)||(pSvcParam->sDependencyLayers[0].sSliceCfg.uiSliceMode == SM_AUTO_SLICE))
&& pSvcParam->iMultipleThreadIdc >= pSvcParam->sDependencyLayers[0].sSliceCfg.sSliceArgument.uiSliceNum
&& pSvcParam->sDependencyLayers[did_list[iSpatialNum - 1]].sSliceCfg.uiSliceMode == SM_FIXEDSLCNUM_SLICE
&& ((pSvcParam->sDependencyLayers[did_list[iSpatialNum - 1]].sSliceCfg.uiSliceMode == SM_FIXEDSLCNUM_SLICE)||(pSvcParam->sDependencyLayers[did_list[iSpatialNum - 1]].sSliceCfg.uiSliceMode == SM_AUTO_SLICE))
&& pSvcParam->iMultipleThreadIdc >= pSvcParam->sDependencyLayers[did_list[iSpatialNum -
1]].sSliceCfg.sSliceArgument.uiSliceNum) {
AdjustBaseLayer (pCtx);