further in this section (the term has been also introduced by L. Breiman). The classification works as follows: the random trees classifier takes the input feature vector, classifies it with every tree in the forest, and outputs the class label that recieved the majority of "votes". In case of regression, the classifier response is the average of the responses over all the trees in the forest.
All the trees are trained with the same parameters but on different training sets that are generated from the original training set using the bootstrap procedure: for each training set, you randomly select the same number of vectors as in the original set ( ``=N`` ). The vectors are chosen with replacement. That is, some vectors will occur more than once and some will be absent. At each node of each trained tree, not all the variables are used to find the best split, rather than a random subset of them. With each node a new subset is generated. However, its size is fixed for all the nodes and all the trees. It is a training parameter set to
:math:`\sqrt{number\_of\_variables}` by default. None of the built trees are pruned.
In random trees there is no need for any accuracy estimation procedures, such as cross-validation or bootstrap, or a separate test set to get an estimate of the training error. The error is estimated internally during the training. When the training set for the current tree is drawn by sampling with replacement, some vectors are left out (so-called
After all the trees have been trained, for each vector that has ever been oob, find the class-"winner" for it (the class that has got the majority of votes in the trees where the vector was oob) and compare it to the ground-truth response.
Compute the classification error estimate as ratio of the number of misclassified oob vectors to all the vectors in the original data. In case of regression, the oob-error is computed as the squared error for oob vectors difference divided by the total number of vectors.
The set of training parameters for the forest is a superset of the training parameters for a single tree. However, random trees do not need all the functionality/features of decision trees. Most noticeably, the trees are not pruned, so the cross-validation parameters are not used.
The method ``CvRTrees::train`` is very similar to the first form of ``CvDTree::train`` () and follows the generic method ``CvStatModel::train`` conventions. All the parameters specific to the algorithm training are passed as a
The input parameters of the prediction method are the same as in ``CvDTree::predict`` but the return value type is different. This method returns the cumulative result from all the trees in the forest (the class that receives the majority of voices, or the mean of the regression function estimates).
The method returns the variable importance vector, computed at the training stage when ``:ref:`CvRTParams`::calc_var_importance`` is set. If the training flag is not set, the ``NULL`` pointer is returned. This differs from the decision trees where variable importance can be computed anytime after the training.
The method returns proximity measure between any two samples, which is the ratio of those trees in the ensemble, in which the samples fall into the same leaf node, to the total number of the trees.
