Fixed issue #37.

It seems to be gcc's bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58416
This commit is contained in:
Takatoshi Kondo
2013-11-11 09:51:04 +00:00
parent 5a9f89ae1f
commit 3e2ae7cc78

View File

@@ -111,7 +111,11 @@ static inline int template_callback_array(unpack_user* u, unsigned int n, msgpac
}
static inline int template_callback_array_item(unpack_user* u, msgpack_object* c, msgpack_object o)
{ c->via.array.ptr[c->via.array.size++] = o; return 0; }
{
memcpy(&c->via.array.ptr[c->via.array.size], &o, sizeof(msgpack_object));
++c->via.array.size;
return 0;
}
static inline int template_callback_map(unpack_user* u, unsigned int n, msgpack_object* o)
{
@@ -124,8 +128,8 @@ static inline int template_callback_map(unpack_user* u, unsigned int n, msgpack_
static inline int template_callback_map_item(unpack_user* u, msgpack_object* c, msgpack_object k, msgpack_object v)
{
c->via.map.ptr[c->via.map.size].key = k;
c->via.map.ptr[c->via.map.size].val = v;
memcpy(&c->via.map.ptr[c->via.map.size].key, &k, sizeof(msgpack_object));
memcpy(&c->via.map.ptr[c->via.map.size].val, &v, sizeof(msgpack_object));
++c->via.map.size;
return 0;
}