libzmq/tests/test_req_relaxed.cpp
Simon Giesecke 779d120fa3 Problem: tests do not follow naming style
Solution: apply naming style
2018-05-27 13:24:08 +02:00

221 lines
6.9 KiB
C++

/*
Copyright (c) 2007-2017 Contributors as noted in the AUTHORS file
This file is part of libzmq, the ZeroMQ core engine in C++.
libzmq is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) as published
by the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
As a special exception, the Contributors give you permission to link
this library with independent modules to produce an executable,
regardless of the license terms of these independent modules, and to
copy and distribute the resulting executable under terms of your choice,
provided that you also meet, for each linked independent module, the
terms and conditions of the license of that module. An independent
module is a module which is not derived from or based on this library.
If you modify this library, you must extend this exception to your
version of the library.
libzmq is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU Lesser General Public
License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License
along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
#include "testutil.hpp"
static void bounce (void *socket_)
{
int more;
size_t more_size = sizeof (more);
do {
zmq_msg_t recv_part, sent_part;
int rc = zmq_msg_init (&recv_part);
assert (rc == 0);
rc = zmq_msg_recv (&recv_part, socket_, 0);
assert (rc != -1);
rc = zmq_getsockopt (socket_, ZMQ_RCVMORE, &more, &more_size);
assert (rc == 0);
zmq_msg_init (&sent_part);
zmq_msg_copy (&sent_part, &recv_part);
rc = zmq_msg_send (&sent_part, socket_, more ? ZMQ_SNDMORE : 0);
assert (rc != -1);
zmq_msg_close (&recv_part);
} while (more);
}
static int get_events (void *socket_)
{
int rc;
int events;
size_t events_size = sizeof (events);
rc = zmq_getsockopt (socket_, ZMQ_EVENTS, &events, &events_size);
assert (rc == 0);
return events;
}
int main (void)
{
setup_test_environment ();
size_t len = MAX_SOCKET_STRING;
char my_endpoint[MAX_SOCKET_STRING];
void *ctx = zmq_ctx_new ();
assert (ctx);
void *req = zmq_socket (ctx, ZMQ_REQ);
assert (req);
int enabled = 1;
int rc = zmq_setsockopt (req, ZMQ_REQ_RELAXED, &enabled, sizeof (int));
assert (rc == 0);
rc = zmq_setsockopt (req, ZMQ_REQ_CORRELATE, &enabled, sizeof (int));
assert (rc == 0);
rc = zmq_bind (req, "tcp://127.0.0.1:*");
assert (rc == 0);
rc = zmq_getsockopt (req, ZMQ_LAST_ENDPOINT, my_endpoint, &len);
assert (rc == 0);
const size_t services = 5;
void *rep[services];
for (size_t peer = 0; peer < services; peer++) {
rep[peer] = zmq_socket (ctx, ZMQ_REP);
assert (rep[peer]);
int timeout = 500;
rc = zmq_setsockopt (rep[peer], ZMQ_RCVTIMEO, &timeout, sizeof (int));
assert (rc == 0);
rc = zmq_connect (rep[peer], my_endpoint);
assert (rc == 0);
}
// We have to give the connects time to finish otherwise the requests
// will not properly round-robin. We could alternatively connect the
// REQ sockets to the REP sockets.
msleep (SETTLE_TIME);
// Case 1: Second send() before a reply arrives in a pipe.
int events = get_events (req);
assert (events == ZMQ_POLLOUT);
// Send a request, ensure it arrives, don't send a reply
s_send_seq (req, "A", "B", SEQ_END);
s_recv_seq (rep[0], "A", "B", SEQ_END);
events = get_events (req);
assert (events == ZMQ_POLLOUT);
// Send another request on the REQ socket
s_send_seq (req, "C", "D", SEQ_END);
s_recv_seq (rep[1], "C", "D", SEQ_END);
events = get_events (req);
assert (events == ZMQ_POLLOUT);
// Send a reply to the first request - that should be discarded by the REQ
s_send_seq (rep[0], "WRONG", SEQ_END);
// Send the expected reply
s_send_seq (rep[1], "OK", SEQ_END);
s_recv_seq (req, "OK", SEQ_END);
// Another standard req-rep cycle, just to check
s_send_seq (req, "E", SEQ_END);
s_recv_seq (rep[2], "E", SEQ_END);
s_send_seq (rep[2], "F", "G", SEQ_END);
s_recv_seq (req, "F", "G", SEQ_END);
// Case 2: Second send() after a reply is already in a pipe on the REQ.
// Send a request, ensure it arrives, send a reply
s_send_seq (req, "H", SEQ_END);
s_recv_seq (rep[3], "H", SEQ_END);
s_send_seq (rep[3], "BAD", SEQ_END);
// Wait for message to be there.
msleep (SETTLE_TIME);
// Without receiving that reply, send another request on the REQ socket
s_send_seq (req, "I", SEQ_END);
s_recv_seq (rep[4], "I", SEQ_END);
// Send the expected reply
s_send_seq (rep[4], "GOOD", SEQ_END);
s_recv_seq (req, "GOOD", SEQ_END);
// Case 3: Check issue #1690. Two send() in a row should not close the
// communication pipes. For example pipe from req to rep[0] should not be
// closed after executing Case 1. So rep[0] should be the next to receive,
// not rep[1].
s_send_seq (req, "J", SEQ_END);
s_recv_seq (rep[0], "J", SEQ_END);
close_zero_linger (req);
for (size_t peer = 0; peer < services; peer++)
close_zero_linger (rep[peer]);
// Wait for disconnects.
msleep (SETTLE_TIME);
// Case 4: Check issue #1695. As messages may pile up before a responder
// is available, we check that responses to messages other than the last
// sent one are correctly discarded by the REQ pipe
// Setup REQ socket as client
req = zmq_socket (ctx, ZMQ_REQ);
assert (req);
rc = zmq_setsockopt (req, ZMQ_REQ_RELAXED, &enabled, sizeof (int));
assert (rc == 0);
rc = zmq_setsockopt (req, ZMQ_REQ_CORRELATE, &enabled, sizeof (int));
assert (rc == 0);
rc = zmq_connect (req, ENDPOINT_0);
assert (rc == 0);
// Setup ROUTER socket as server but do not bind it just yet
void *router = zmq_socket (ctx, ZMQ_ROUTER);
assert (router);
// Send two requests
s_send_seq (req, "TO_BE_DISCARDED", SEQ_END);
s_send_seq (req, "TO_BE_ANSWERED", SEQ_END);
// Bind server allowing it to receive messages
rc = zmq_bind (router, ENDPOINT_0);
assert (rc == 0);
// Read the two messages and send them back as is
bounce (router);
bounce (router);
// Read the expected correlated reply. As the ZMQ_REQ_CORRELATE is active,
// the expected answer is "TO_BE_ANSWERED", not "TO_BE_DISCARDED".
s_recv_seq (req, "TO_BE_ANSWERED", SEQ_END);
close_zero_linger (req);
close_zero_linger (router);
// Wait for disconnects.
msleep (SETTLE_TIME);
rc = zmq_ctx_term (ctx);
assert (rc == 0);
return 0;
}