From e3ee55b191c0236adb6a547e5dd59f709fac9195 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luca Boccassi Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 18:05:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Problem: missing indentation for UDP branch Solution: fix it --- src/socket_base.cpp | 26 +++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/socket_base.cpp b/src/socket_base.cpp index aff05c84..acf62e18 100644 --- a/src/socket_base.cpp +++ b/src/socket_base.cpp @@ -902,21 +902,21 @@ int zmq::socket_base_t::connect (const char *addr_) } #endif -if (protocol == "udp") { - if (options.type != ZMQ_RADIO) { - errno = ENOCOMPATPROTO; - LIBZMQ_DELETE(paddr); - return -1; - } + if (protocol == "udp") { + if (options.type != ZMQ_RADIO) { + errno = ENOCOMPATPROTO; + LIBZMQ_DELETE(paddr); + return -1; + } - paddr->resolved.udp_addr = new (std::nothrow) udp_address_t (); - alloc_assert (paddr->resolved.udp_addr); - rc = paddr->resolved.udp_addr->resolve (address.c_str(), false); - if (rc != 0) { - LIBZMQ_DELETE(paddr); - return -1; + paddr->resolved.udp_addr = new (std::nothrow) udp_address_t (); + alloc_assert (paddr->resolved.udp_addr); + rc = paddr->resolved.udp_addr->resolve (address.c_str(), false); + if (rc != 0) { + LIBZMQ_DELETE(paddr); + return -1; + } } -} // TBD - Should we check address for ZMQ_HAVE_NORM???