Problem: inconsistent parameter names

Solution: harmonize
This commit is contained in:
Simon Giesecke
2018-05-30 22:46:29 +02:00
parent ce4b71c3fa
commit c641644bb2
2 changed files with 25 additions and 24 deletions

View File

@@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ void zmq::socket_base_t::extract_flags (msg_t *msg_)
_rcvmore = (msg_->flags () & msg_t::more) != 0;
}
int zmq::socket_base_t::monitor (const char *addr_, int events_)
int zmq::socket_base_t::monitor (const char *endpoint_, int events_)
{
scoped_lock_t lock (_monitor_sync);
@@ -1587,14 +1587,14 @@ int zmq::socket_base_t::monitor (const char *addr_, int events_)
}
// Support deregistering monitoring endpoints as well
if (addr_ == NULL) {
if (endpoint_ == NULL) {
stop_monitor ();
return 0;
}
// Parse addr_ string.
std::string protocol;
std::string address;
if (parse_uri (addr_, protocol, address) || check_protocol (protocol))
if (parse_uri (endpoint_, protocol, address) || check_protocol (protocol))
return -1;
// Event notification only supported over inproc://
@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ int zmq::socket_base_t::monitor (const char *addr_, int events_)
stop_monitor (false);
// Spawn the monitor socket endpoint
rc = zmq_bind (_monitor_socket, addr_);
rc = zmq_bind (_monitor_socket, endpoint_);
if (rc == -1)
stop_monitor (false);
return rc;
@@ -1809,34 +1809,35 @@ std::string zmq::routing_socket_base_t::extract_connect_routing_id ()
return res;
}
void zmq::routing_socket_base_t::add_out_pipe (blob_t routing_id, pipe_t *pipe_)
void zmq::routing_socket_base_t::add_out_pipe (blob_t routing_id_,
pipe_t *pipe_)
{
// Add the record into output pipes lookup table
const out_pipe_t outpipe = {pipe_, true};
const bool ok =
_out_pipes.ZMQ_MAP_INSERT_OR_EMPLACE (ZMQ_MOVE (routing_id), outpipe)
_out_pipes.ZMQ_MAP_INSERT_OR_EMPLACE (ZMQ_MOVE (routing_id_), outpipe)
.second;
zmq_assert (ok);
}
bool zmq::routing_socket_base_t::has_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id) const
bool zmq::routing_socket_base_t::has_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id_) const
{
return 0 != _out_pipes.count (routing_id);
return 0 != _out_pipes.count (routing_id_);
}
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::out_pipe_t *
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::lookup_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id)
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::lookup_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id_)
{
// TODO we could probably avoid constructor a temporary blob_t to call this function
out_pipes_t::iterator it = _out_pipes.find (routing_id);
out_pipes_t::iterator it = _out_pipes.find (routing_id_);
return it == _out_pipes.end () ? NULL : &it->second;
}
const zmq::routing_socket_base_t::out_pipe_t *
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::lookup_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id) const
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::lookup_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id_) const
{
// TODO we could probably avoid constructor a temporary blob_t to call this function
out_pipes_t::const_iterator it = _out_pipes.find (routing_id);
out_pipes_t::const_iterator it = _out_pipes.find (routing_id_);
return it == _out_pipes.end () ? NULL : &it->second;
}
@@ -1847,9 +1848,9 @@ void zmq::routing_socket_base_t::erase_out_pipe (pipe_t *pipe_)
}
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::out_pipe_t
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::try_erase_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id)
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::try_erase_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id_)
{
const out_pipes_t::iterator it = _out_pipes.find (routing_id);
const out_pipes_t::iterator it = _out_pipes.find (routing_id_);
out_pipe_t res = {NULL, false};
if (it != _out_pipes.end ()) {
res = it->second;