mirror of
https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq.git
synced 2025-10-30 13:47:13 +01:00
Removed ZMQ_ZAP_IPC_CREDS option
- This seems redundant; is there a use case for NOT providing the IPC credentials to the ZAP authenticator? - More, why is IPC authentication done via libzmq instead of ZAP? Is it because we're missing the transport type on the ZAP request?
This commit is contained in:
@@ -51,9 +51,6 @@ zmq::options_t::options_t () :
|
||||
tcp_keepalive_cnt (-1),
|
||||
tcp_keepalive_idle (-1),
|
||||
tcp_keepalive_intvl (-1),
|
||||
# if defined ZMQ_HAVE_SO_PEERCRED || defined ZMQ_HAVE_LOCAL_PEERCRED
|
||||
zap_ipc_creds (false),
|
||||
# endif
|
||||
mechanism (ZMQ_NULL),
|
||||
as_server (0),
|
||||
socket_id (0),
|
||||
@@ -261,13 +258,6 @@ int zmq::options_t::setsockopt (int option_, const void *optval_,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
# if defined ZMQ_HAVE_SO_PEERCRED || defined ZMQ_HAVE_LOCAL_PEERCRED
|
||||
case ZMQ_ZAP_IPC_CREDS:
|
||||
if (is_int && (value == 0 || value == 1)) {
|
||||
zap_ipc_creds = (value != 0);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case ZMQ_IPC_FILTER_UID:
|
||||
if (optvallen_ == 0 && optval_ == NULL) {
|
||||
ipc_uid_accept_filters.clear ();
|
||||
@@ -601,15 +591,6 @@ int zmq::options_t::getsockopt (int option_, void *optval_, size_t *optvallen_)
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
# if defined ZMQ_HAVE_SO_PEERCRED || defined ZMQ_HAVE_LOCAL_PEERCRED
|
||||
case ZMQ_ZAP_IPC_CREDS:
|
||||
if (is_int) {
|
||||
*value = zap_ipc_creds;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
# endif
|
||||
|
||||
case ZMQ_MECHANISM:
|
||||
if (is_int) {
|
||||
*value = mechanism;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user