Merge pull request #1777 from brian-peloton/master

Use memcpy instead of assuming option values are aligned
This commit is contained in:
Pieter Hintjens 2016-02-07 10:31:06 +01:00
commit 4c6753346b
5 changed files with 10 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -70,7 +70,8 @@ int zmq::dealer_t::xsetsockopt (int option_, const void *optval_,
size_t optvallen_)
{
bool is_int = (optvallen_ == sizeof (int));
int value = is_int? *((int *) optval_): 0;
int value = 0;
if (is_int) memcpy(&value, optval_, sizeof (int));
switch (option_) {
case ZMQ_PROBE_ROUTER:

View File

@ -92,7 +92,8 @@ int zmq::options_t::setsockopt (int option_, const void *optval_,
size_t optvallen_)
{
bool is_int = (optvallen_ == sizeof (int));
int value = is_int? *((int *) optval_): 0;
int value = 0;
if (is_int) memcpy(&value, optval_, sizeof (int));
#if defined (ZMQ_ACT_MILITANT)
bool malformed = true; // Did caller pass a bad option value?
#endif

View File

@ -204,7 +204,8 @@ bool zmq::req_t::xhas_out ()
int zmq::req_t::xsetsockopt (int option_, const void *optval_, size_t optvallen_)
{
bool is_int = (optvallen_ == sizeof (int));
int value = is_int? *((int *) optval_): 0;
int value = 0;
if (is_int) memcpy(&value, optval_, sizeof (int));
switch (option_) {
case ZMQ_REQ_CORRELATE:

View File

@ -97,7 +97,8 @@ int zmq::router_t::xsetsockopt (int option_, const void *optval_,
size_t optvallen_)
{
bool is_int = (optvallen_ == sizeof (int));
int value = is_int? *((int *) optval_): 0;
int value = 0;
if (is_int) memcpy(&value, optval_, sizeof (int));
switch (option_) {
case ZMQ_CONNECT_RID:

View File

@ -178,7 +178,8 @@ int zmq::stream_t::xsetsockopt (int option_, const void *optval_,
size_t optvallen_)
{
bool is_int = (optvallen_ == sizeof (int));
int value = is_int? *((int *) optval_): 0;
int value = 0;
if (is_int) memcpy(&value, optval_, sizeof (int));
switch (option_) {
case ZMQ_CONNECT_RID: