Fixed#2823 - Make it so that a semicolon appearing after an invocation of GTEST_SUPPRESS_UNREACHABLE_CODE_WARNING_BELOW_ does not trigger a redundant semicolon warning.
This works by introducing an else block with a statement that intentionally does not end with a semicolon, forcing users to place the semicolon after the expansion. The approach here is preferred as opposed to removing semicolons that appear after each invocation because complete statements that do not have a visible semicolon or braces confuse users and code formatters, since the macro invocation looks superficially like an expression.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 311327491
The documentation for IsDebuggerPresent says that one just should
include windows.h, as that one is an umbrella header that includes
the header that declares IsDebuggerPresent. In older Windows SDKs,
debugapi.h didn't exist and IsDebuggerPresent was declared in
winbase.h (also included by windows.h).
This should fix issue #2822 properly.
This reverts commit a9f6c1ed14.
That commit cannot fix the issue it sets out to fix.
The original issue, #2822, was that building with a toolset
targeting XP compatibility is missing the debugapi.h header -
as debugapi.h didn't exist in older Windows SDKs.
Commit a9f6c1ed14 misinterpreted
the Microsoft documentation about IsDebuggerPresent. The information
about which header to use, "debugapi.h (include Windows.h)" means
that the function declaration currently lives in debugapi.h, but
for compatibility, just include the Windows.h umbrella header.
In older Windows SDKs (e.g. the v6.0a SDK), IsDebuggerPresent
is declared in winbase.h, and debugapi.h doesn't exist at all in those
versions.
Including Windows.h with a different capitalization than the existing
include won't help finding headers that don't exist.
Including Windows.h with a capital W breaks cross compilation with mingw
toolchains, where the header always has been spelled with a lower case
W. When building on native windows, the file system is case insensitive
and the capitalization doesn't matter.
This fixes issue #2840.
Fix `-Wgnu-zero-variadic-macro-arguments` in GMock
Passing zero arguments to the variadic part of a macro is a GNU
extension and triggers warnings when build projects using GMock with
`-pedantic`.
- Fix uses of `GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_16TH` to always receive at least 17
arguments. (this was triggered when `GMOCK_PP_NARG` or `GMOCK_PP_HAS_COMMA`
were used with an argument containing no commas).
- Fix `GMOCK_PP_HEAD` to append a dummy unused argument so that
`GMOCK_PP_INTERNAL_HEAD` always has two arguments.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 310414611
Explicitly define copy constructors used in googletest tests
As of C++11, providing a user-declared copy assignment operator should
suppress the availability of an implicit default copy constructor.
Classes that provide (or delete) a copy assignment operator must provide
their own copy constructor if one is desired. This may be an explicit
default copy constructor if appropriate.
As googletest is a C++11 codebase, this change should be made without
qualification.
This addresses the -Wdeprecated-copy warnings issued by trunk clang:
While compiling googletest/test/googletest-death-test-test.cc:
In file included from .../googletest/test/googletest-death-test-test.cc:33:
.../googletest/include/gtest/gtest-death-test.h:196:8: error: definition of implicit copy constructor for 'ExitedWithCode' is deprecated because it has a user-declared copy assignment operator [-Werror,-Wdeprecated-copy]
void operator=(const ExitedWithCode& other);
^
.../googletest/test/googletest-death-test-test.cc:279:16: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'testing::ExitedWithCode' first required here
EXPECT_PRED1(pred0, status0);
^
While compiling googletest/test/googletest-param-test-test.cc:
.../googletest/test/googletest-param-test-test.cc:502:8: error: definition of implicit copy constructor for 'NonDefaultConstructAssignString' is deprecated because it has a user-declared copy assignment operator [-Werror,-Wdeprecated-copy]
void operator=(const NonDefaultConstructAssignString&);
^
.../googletest/test/googletest-param-test-test.cc:507:36: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'NonDefaultConstructAssignString' first required here
Combine(Values(0, 1), Values(NonDefaultConstructAssignString("A"),
This matches other changes made elsewhere in the googletest codebase,
such as 306f3754a7. Perhaps those previous changes did not consider
test code.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 307495126
googletest-param-test-test.cc:502:8: error:
definition of implicit copy constructor for
'NonDefaultConstructAssignString' is deprecated because it has a
user-declared copy assignment operator [-Werror,-Wdeprecated]
void operator=(const NonDefaultConstructAssignString&);
^
googletest-port-test.cc:97:11: error:
definition of implicit copy constructor for 'Base' is deprecated because
it has a user-declared destructor [-Werror,-Wdeprecated]
virtual ~Base() {}
^
gmock-spec-builders.h:503:3: error:
definition of implicit copy constructor for 'Expectation' is deprecated
because it has a user-declared destructor [-Werror,-Wdeprecated]
~Expectation();
^
None of these are strictly needed for correctness.
A large number of them (maybe all of them?) trigger `-Wdeprecated`
warnings on Clang trunk as soon as you try to use the implicitly
defaulted (but deprecated) copy constructor of a class that has
deleted its copy assignment operator.
By declaring a deleted copy assignment operator, the old code
also caused the move constructor and move assignment operator
to be non-declared. This means that the old code never got move
semantics -- "move-construction" would simply call the defaulted
(but deprecated) copy constructor instead. With the new code,
"move-construction" calls the defaulted move constructor, which
I believe is what we want to happen. So this is a runtime
performance optimization.
Unfortunately we can't yet physically remove the definitions
of these macros from gtest-port.h, because they are being used
by other code internally at Google (according to zhangxy988).
But no new uses should be added going forward.
We are about to remove all uses of GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_ in favor
of using the Rule of Zero everywhere.
Unfortunately, if we use the Rule of Zero here, then when the compiler
needs to figure out if VariadicMatcher is move-constructible, it will
recurse down into `tuple<Args...>`, which on libstdc++ recurses too deeply.
In file included from googlemock/test/gmock-matchers_test.cc:43:
In file included from googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-matchers.h:258:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/5.5.0/algorithm:60:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/5.5.0/utility:70:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/5.5.0/bits/stl_pair.h:59:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/5.5.0/bits/move.h:57:
/usr/bin/include/c++/5.5.0/type_traits:115:26: fatal error:
recursive template instantiation exceeded maximum depth of 256
: public conditional<_B1::value, _B1, _B2>::type
^
The move constructor is the only problematic case, for some unknown reason.
With GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_, the presence of a copy assignment operator
causes the move constructor to be non-declared, thus non-defaulted, thus
non-problematic. Without GTEST_DISALLOW_ASSIGN_, we have to do one of the
following:
- Default the copy constructor, so that the move constructor will be non-declared.
- Define our own non-defaulted move constructor.
...except that doing the latter STILL did not work!
Fortunately, the former (default the copy constructor, don't provide
any move constructor) both works in practice and is semantically
equivalent to the old code.
This change updates testing::internal::IsAProtocolMessage to return true not
just for full proto messages but also for lite ones (i.e. those inheriting
directly from MessageLite).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 304286535
