To access data at multiple fixed offsets from a base address, this
code uses a single "m" operand and code of the form "32%0", relying on
the memory operand instantiation having no displacement, giving a final
result of the form "32(%rax)". If the compiler uses a register and
displacement, e.g. "64(%rax)", the end result becomes "3264(%rax)",
which obviously does not work.
Replacing the "m" operands with "r" operands allows safe addition of a
displacement. In theory, multiple memory operands could use a shared
base register with different index registers, "(%rax,%rbx)", potentially
making more efficient use of registers. In the cases at hand, no such
sharing is possible since the addresses involved are entirely unrelated.
After this change, the code somewhat rudely accesses memory without
using a corresponding memory operand, which in some cases can lead to
unwanted "optimisations" of surrounding code. However, the original
code also accesses memory not covered by a memory operand, so this is
not adding any defect not already present. It is also hightly unlikely
that any such optimisations could be performed here since the memory
locations in questions are not accessed elsewhere in the same functions.
This fixes crashes with suncc.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Refactoring mmx2/mmxext YASM code with cpuflags will force renames.
So switching to a consistent naming scheme beforehand is sensible.
The name "mmxext" is more official and widespread and also the name
of the CPU flag, as reported e.g. by the Linux kernel.
Add support for all x86-64 registers
Prefer caller-saved register over callee-saved on WIN64
Support up to 15 function arguments
Also (by Ronald S. Bultje)
Fix up our asm to work with new x86inc.asm.
Signed-off-by: Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Justin Ruggles <justin.ruggles@gmail.com>
Revert "swscale: update context offsets after removal of AlpMmxFilter."
(commit a95e3fa90b)
and
Revert "swscale: Remove some write-only variables related to alpha handling."
(commit 9d03cb9fc5).
They broke alpha handling - it's the evil inline asm that still uses that
variable, so it's not truely write-only.
They were introduced in an earlier commit that introduced use of named
arguments. One cause was a typo, a second cause appears to be a bug in
x264asm that I work around by not using named arguments.
This will be useful to test more aggressively for failures to mark XMM
registers as clobbered in Win64 builds, and prevent regressions thereof.
Based on a patch by Ramiro Polla <ramiro.polla@gmail.com>
