misc typo fixes

Originally committed as revision 9291 to svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk
This commit is contained in:
Diego Biurrun
2007-06-12 18:50:50 +00:00
parent c294d7c6ba
commit 90b5b51eab
26 changed files with 56 additions and 52 deletions

View File

@@ -373,7 +373,8 @@ static inline void RENAME(doVertLowPass)(uint8_t *src, int stride, PPContext *c)
* Experimental implementation of the filter (Algorithm 1) described in a paper from Ramkishor & Karandikar
* values are correctly clipped (MMX2)
* values are wraparound (C)
* conclusion: its fast, but introduces ugly horizontal patterns if there is a continious gradient
* Conclusion: It is fast, but introduces ugly horizontal patterns
* if there is a continuous gradient.
0 8 16 24
x = 8
x/2 = 4
@@ -3498,7 +3499,7 @@ static void RENAME(postProcess)(uint8_t src[], int srcStride, uint8_t dst[], int
);
#elif defined(HAVE_3DNOW)
//FIXME check if this is faster on an 3dnow chip or if its faster without the prefetch or ...
//FIXME check if this is faster on an 3dnow chip or if it is faster without the prefetch or ...
/* prefetch(srcBlock + (((x>>3)&3) + 5)*srcStride + 32);
prefetch(srcBlock + (((x>>3)&3) + 9)*srcStride + 32);
prefetchw(dstBlock + (((x>>3)&3) + 5)*dstStride + 32);
@@ -3642,7 +3643,7 @@ static void RENAME(postProcess)(uint8_t src[], int srcStride, uint8_t dst[], int
);
#elif defined(HAVE_3DNOW)
//FIXME check if this is faster on an 3dnow chip or if its faster without the prefetch or ...
//FIXME check if this is faster on an 3dnow chip or if it is faster without the prefetch or ...
/* prefetch(srcBlock + (((x>>3)&3) + 5)*srcStride + 32);
prefetch(srcBlock + (((x>>3)&3) + 9)*srcStride + 32);
prefetchw(dstBlock + (((x>>3)&3) + 5)*dstStride + 32);