| .. |
|
alloc.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
assign_initializer_list.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
assign_iter_iter.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
assign_size_value.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
copy_alloc.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
copy.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
default_noexcept.pass.cpp
|
After sleeping on it I've decided that all special members that can be noexcept, should be declared so. The client has the traits to detect and branch on this information, and it is often an important optimization. Give deque() a noexcept. Add test for deque default constructor and deque destructor.
|
2011-06-03 15:16:49 +00:00 |
|
default.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
dtor_noexcept.pass.cpp
|
noexcept for <forward_list>.
|
2011-06-03 16:20:53 +00:00 |
|
initializer_list_alloc.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
initializer_list.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
iter_iter_alloc.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
iter_iter.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
move_alloc.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
move_assign_noexcept.pass.cpp
|
Add noexcept tests for deque.
|
2011-06-03 01:46:22 +00:00 |
|
move_assign.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
move_noexcept.pass.cpp
|
Add noexcept tests for deque.
|
2011-06-03 01:46:22 +00:00 |
|
move.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
op_equal_initializer_list.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
op_equal.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
size_value_alloc.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
size_value.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
|
size.pass.cpp
|
license change
|
2010-11-16 22:09:02 +00:00 |
b965fed10b