From fa8c64946a84be9377ff7eb79d2aa306941aac03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:08:49 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Patch for 2466 is ready

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@249352 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---
 www/kona.html | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/www/kona.html b/www/kona.html
index 31514943..96f75ab3 100644
--- a/www/kona.html
+++ b/www/kona.html
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2435">2435</a></td><td><tt>reference_wrapper::operator()</tt>'s Remark should be deleted</td><td>Kona</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2447">2447</a></td><td>Allocators and <tt>volatile</tt>-qualified value types</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2462">2462</a></td><td><tt>std::ios_base::failure</tt> is overspecified</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2466">2466</a></td><td><tt>allocator_traits::max_size()</tt> default behavior is incorrect</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2466">2466</a></td><td><tt>allocator_traits::max_size()</tt> default behavior is incorrect</td><td>Kona</td><td>Patch Ready</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2469">2469</a></td><td>Wrong specification of Requires clause of <tt>operator[]</tt> for <tt>map</tt> and <tt>unordered_map</tt></td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2473">2473</a></td><td><tt>basic_filebuf</tt>'s relation to C <tt>FILE</tt> semantics</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2476">2476</a></td><td><tt>scoped_allocator_adaptor</tt> is not assignable</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
 <li><i>2435 - Wording cleanup; no code change required</i></li>
 <li>2447 - I don't know if there's any work here.</li>
 <li>2462 - No code change necessary. Are there tests here? Should there be?</li>
-<li>2466 - Simple change; need a test.</li>
+<li><i>2466 - Simple change; need a test.</i></li>
 <li>2469 - I suspect this is just wording cleanup, but it needs a closer look.</li>
 <li>2473 - I suspect this is just wording cleanup, but it needs a closer look.</li>
 <li>2476 - Simple change; need tests.</li>