My previous reorganization of addressof broke -std=c++03. Thanks much to Arnold Schwaighofer for catching this. This patch also catches a few more missing addressof in <future>, thanks go to Zhihao Yuan for catching these.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@187997 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
@@ -618,55 +618,7 @@ void* align(size_t alignment, size_t size, void*& ptr, size_t& space);
|
||||
|
||||
_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
|
||||
|
||||
// addressof
|
||||
|
||||
template <class _Tp>
|
||||
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
|
||||
_Tp*
|
||||
addressof(_Tp& __x) _NOEXCEPT
|
||||
{
|
||||
return (_Tp*)&reinterpret_cast<const volatile char&>(__x);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_OBJC_ARC) && !defined(_LIBCPP_PREDEFINED_OBJC_ARC_ADDRESSOF)
|
||||
// Objective-C++ Automatic Reference Counting uses qualified pointers
|
||||
// that require special addressof() signatures. When
|
||||
// _LIBCPP_PREDEFINED_OBJC_ARC_ADDRESSOF is defined, the compiler
|
||||
// itself is providing these definitions. Otherwise, we provide them.
|
||||
template <class _Tp>
|
||||
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
|
||||
__strong _Tp*
|
||||
addressof(__strong _Tp& __x) _NOEXCEPT
|
||||
{
|
||||
return &__x;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef _LIBCPP_HAS_OBJC_ARC_WEAK
|
||||
template <class _Tp>
|
||||
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
|
||||
__weak _Tp*
|
||||
addressof(__weak _Tp& __x) _NOEXCEPT
|
||||
{
|
||||
return &__x;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
template <class _Tp>
|
||||
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
|
||||
__autoreleasing _Tp*
|
||||
addressof(__autoreleasing _Tp& __x) _NOEXCEPT
|
||||
{
|
||||
return &__x;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
template <class _Tp>
|
||||
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
|
||||
__unsafe_unretained _Tp*
|
||||
addressof(__unsafe_unretained _Tp& __x) _NOEXCEPT
|
||||
{
|
||||
return &__x;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
// addressof moved to <__functional_base>
|
||||
|
||||
template <class _Tp> class allocator;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user