Fix GCC atomic implementation in C++03
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@250279 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
parent
a6622799b4
commit
a4ae16b67a
@ -552,7 +552,12 @@ typedef enum memory_order
|
|||||||
namespace __gcc_atomic {
|
namespace __gcc_atomic {
|
||||||
template <typename _Tp>
|
template <typename _Tp>
|
||||||
struct __gcc_atomic_t {
|
struct __gcc_atomic_t {
|
||||||
__gcc_atomic_t() _NOEXCEPT {}
|
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
|
||||||
|
#ifndef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS
|
||||||
|
__gcc_atomic_t() _NOEXCEPT = default;
|
||||||
|
#else
|
||||||
|
__gcc_atomic_t() _NOEXCEPT : __a_value() {}
|
||||||
|
#endif // _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS
|
||||||
_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR explicit __gcc_atomic_t(_Tp value) _NOEXCEPT
|
_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR explicit __gcc_atomic_t(_Tp value) _NOEXCEPT
|
||||||
: __a_value(value) {}
|
: __a_value(value) {}
|
||||||
_Tp __a_value;
|
_Tp __a_value;
|
||||||
@ -573,7 +578,7 @@ struct __can_assign {
|
|||||||
sizeof(__test_atomic_assignable<_Tp, _Td>(1)) == sizeof(char);
|
sizeof(__test_atomic_assignable<_Tp, _Td>(1)) == sizeof(char);
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static inline constexpr int __to_gcc_order(memory_order __order) {
|
static inline _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR int __to_gcc_order(memory_order __order) {
|
||||||
// Avoid switch statement to make this a constexpr.
|
// Avoid switch statement to make this a constexpr.
|
||||||
return __order == memory_order_relaxed ? __ATOMIC_RELAXED:
|
return __order == memory_order_relaxed ? __ATOMIC_RELAXED:
|
||||||
(__order == memory_order_acquire ? __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE:
|
(__order == memory_order_acquire ? __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE:
|
||||||
@ -583,7 +588,7 @@ static inline constexpr int __to_gcc_order(memory_order __order) {
|
|||||||
__ATOMIC_CONSUME))));
|
__ATOMIC_CONSUME))));
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static inline constexpr int __to_gcc_failure_order(memory_order __order) {
|
static inline _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR int __to_gcc_failure_order(memory_order __order) {
|
||||||
// Avoid switch statement to make this a constexpr.
|
// Avoid switch statement to make this a constexpr.
|
||||||
return __order == memory_order_relaxed ? __ATOMIC_RELAXED:
|
return __order == memory_order_relaxed ? __ATOMIC_RELAXED:
|
||||||
(__order == memory_order_acquire ? __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE:
|
(__order == memory_order_acquire ? __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE:
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user