Fix failed test command repro printing for *.pass.cpp tests
Before we were printing out the compile command twice, which isn't that useful. Thanks EricWF for the report! git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@232526 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
parent
62a06f9fba
commit
9be398d6c1
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ class Executor(object):
|
||||
file_deps: [str]: Files required by the test
|
||||
env: {str: str}: Environment variables to execute under
|
||||
Returns:
|
||||
out, err, exitCode
|
||||
cmd, out, err, exitCode
|
||||
"""
|
||||
raise NotImplementedError
|
||||
|
||||
@ -34,7 +34,8 @@ class LocalExecutor(Executor):
|
||||
env_cmd += ['%s=%s' % (k, v) for k, v in env.items()]
|
||||
if work_dir == '.':
|
||||
work_dir = os.getcwd()
|
||||
return executeCommand(env_cmd + cmd, cwd=work_dir)
|
||||
out, err, rc = executeCommand(env_cmd + cmd, cwd=work_dir)
|
||||
return (env_cmd + cmd, out, err, rc)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class PrefixExecutor(Executor):
|
||||
@ -129,6 +130,9 @@ class RemoteExecutor(Executor):
|
||||
srcs.extend(file_deps)
|
||||
dsts.extend(dev_paths)
|
||||
self.copy_in(srcs, dsts)
|
||||
# TODO(jroelofs): capture the copy_in and delete_remote commands,
|
||||
# and conjugate them with '&&'s around the first tuple element
|
||||
# returned here:
|
||||
return self._execute_command_remote(cmd, target_cwd, env)
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
if target_cwd:
|
||||
|
@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ class LibcxxTestFormat(object):
|
||||
# should add a `// FILE-DEP: foo.dat` to each test to track this.
|
||||
data_files = [os.path.join(local_cwd, f)
|
||||
for f in os.listdir(local_cwd) if f.endswith('.dat')]
|
||||
out, err, rc = self.executor.run(exec_path, [exec_path],
|
||||
local_cwd, data_files, env)
|
||||
cmd, out, err, rc = self.executor.run(exec_path, [exec_path],
|
||||
local_cwd, data_files, env)
|
||||
if rc != 0:
|
||||
report = libcxx.util.makeReport(cmd, out, err, rc)
|
||||
report = "Compiled With: %s\n%s" % (compile_cmd, report)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user