Kim Rinnewitz reported that --local-port didn't work with TFTP transfers.

This happened because the tftp code always uncondionally did a bind()
without caring if one already had been done and then it failed. I wrote a
test case (1009) to verify this, but it is a bit error-prone since it will
have to pick a fixed local port number and since the tests are run on so
many different hosts in different situations I add it in disabled state.
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Stenberg
2007-10-04 10:01:41 +00:00
parent 91b38857ef
commit 67d94514b0
8 changed files with 65 additions and 8 deletions

43
tests/data/test1009 Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
<testcase>
<info>
<keywords>
TFTP
TFTP RRQ
</keywords>
</info>
#
# Server-side
<reply>
<data>
a chunk of
data
returned
to client
</data>
</reply>
#
# Client-side
<client>
<server>
tftp
</server>
<name>
TFTP retrieve
</name>
<command>
tftp://%HOSTIP:%TFTPPORT//1009 --local-port 44444
</command>
</client>
#
# Verify pseudo protocol after the test has been "shot"
<verify>
<protocol>
opcode: 1
filename: /1009
mode: octet
</protocol>
</verify>
</testcase>