Reverted the previous change and redid it differently as it seemed to not

work. This is supposed to detect cross-compiling and alert the user, and not
do the POSIX-check for strerror_r() if it already detected a glibc-compatible
strerror_r().
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Stenberg
2004-06-07 08:30:36 +00:00
parent 4c58797607
commit 18dd8154e2

View File

@@ -423,11 +423,15 @@ main () {
return 0; return 0;
} }
], ],
dnl if it worked fine GLIBC_STRERROR_R="1"
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_GLIBC_STRERROR_R, 1, [we have a glibc-style strerror_r()]) AC_DEFINE(HAVE_GLIBC_STRERROR_R, 1, [we have a glibc-style strerror_r()])
AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]), AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]),
dnl this didn't work! AC_MSG_RESULT([no]),
AC_MSG_RESULT([no]) dnl cross-compiling!
AC_MSG_NOTICE([cannot determine strerror_r() style: edit lib/config.h manually!])
)
if test -z "$GLIBC_STRERROR_R"; then
AC_MSG_CHECKING([for a POSIX strerror_r API]) AC_MSG_CHECKING([for a POSIX strerror_r API])
AC_TRY_RUN([ AC_TRY_RUN([
@@ -445,18 +449,16 @@ main () {
return 0; return 0;
} }
], ],
dnl it worked, we have POSIX-style strerror()
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_POSIX_STRERROR_R, 1, [we have a POSIX-style strerror_r()]) AC_DEFINE(HAVE_POSIX_STRERROR_R, 1, [we have a POSIX-style strerror_r()])
AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]), AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]),
dnl it failed, we don't have POSIX-style AC_MSG_RESULT([no]) ,
AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
) dnl end of AC_TRY_RUN() for POSIX strerror_r()
dnl cross-compiling! dnl cross-compiling!
,
AC_MSG_NOTICE([cannot determine strerror_r() style: edit lib/config.h manually!]) AC_MSG_NOTICE([cannot determine strerror_r() style: edit lib/config.h manually!])
) dnl end of AC_TRY_RUN() for glibc strerror_r() )
fi
fi dnl if not using glibc API
fi dnl we have a strerror_r
]) ])