Problem: addition of new single-argument message_t introduces ambiguity when calling e.g. socket_t::send

Solution: make single-argument constructor explicit
This commit is contained in:
Simon Giesecke
2018-08-21 13:03:29 +02:00
parent 8ff83257ac
commit ab09f5da98
3 changed files with 17 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ TEST(active_poller, poll_basic)
{
server_client_setup s;
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send("Hi"));
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send(zmq::message_t{"Hi"}));
zmq::active_poller_t active_poller;
bool message_received = false;
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ TEST(active_poller, client_server)
ASSERT_NO_THROW(active_poller.add(s.server, ZMQ_POLLIN, handler));
// client sends message
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send(send_msg));
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send(zmq::message_t{send_msg}));
ASSERT_EQ(1, active_poller.wait(std::chrono::milliseconds{-1}));
ASSERT_EQ(events, ZMQ_POLLIN);
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ TEST(active_poller, remove_invalid_socket_throws)
TEST(active_poller, wait_on_added_empty_handler)
{
server_client_setup s;
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send("Hi"));
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send(zmq::message_t{"Hi"}));
zmq::active_poller_t active_poller;
zmq::active_poller_t::handler_t handler;
ASSERT_NO_THROW(active_poller.add(s.server, ZMQ_POLLIN, handler));
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ TEST(active_poller, poll_client_server)
ASSERT_NO_THROW(active_poller.add(s.server, ZMQ_POLLIN, s.handler));
// client sends message
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send("Hi"));
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send(zmq::message_t{"Hi"}));
// wait for message and verify events
ASSERT_NO_THROW(active_poller.wait(std::chrono::milliseconds{500}));
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ TEST(active_poller, wait_one_return)
active_poller.add(s.server, ZMQ_POLLIN, [&count](short) { ++count; }));
// client sends message
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send("Hi"));
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send(zmq::message_t{"Hi"}));
// wait for message and verify events
ASSERT_EQ(1, active_poller.wait(std::chrono::milliseconds{500}));
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ TEST(active_poller, wait_one_return)
TEST(active_poller, wait_on_move_constructed_active_poller)
{
server_client_setup s;
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send("Hi"));
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send(zmq::message_t{"Hi"}));
zmq::active_poller_t a;
zmq::active_poller_t::handler_t handler;
ASSERT_NO_THROW(a.add(s.server, ZMQ_POLLIN, handler));
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ TEST(active_poller, wait_on_move_constructed_active_poller)
TEST(active_poller, wait_on_move_assigned_active_poller)
{
server_client_setup s;
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send("Hi"));
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send(zmq::message_t{"Hi"}));
zmq::active_poller_t a;
zmq::active_poller_t::handler_t handler;
ASSERT_NO_THROW(a.add(s.server, ZMQ_POLLIN, handler));
@@ -360,14 +360,14 @@ TEST(active_poller, received_on_move_constructed_active_poller)
zmq::active_poller_t a;
ASSERT_NO_THROW(a.add(s.server, ZMQ_POLLIN, [&count](short) { ++count; }));
// client sends message
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send("Hi"));
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send(zmq::message_t{"Hi"}));
// wait for message and verify it is received
ASSERT_EQ(1, a.wait(std::chrono::milliseconds{500}));
ASSERT_EQ(1u, count);
// Move construct active_poller b
zmq::active_poller_t b{std::move(a)};
// client sends message again
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send("Hi"));
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send(zmq::message_t{"Hi"}));
// wait for message and verify it is received
ASSERT_EQ(1, b.wait(std::chrono::milliseconds{500}));
ASSERT_EQ(2u, count);
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ TEST(active_poller, remove_from_handler)
ASSERT_EQ(ITER_NO, active_poller.size());
// Clients send messages
for (auto &s : setup_list) {
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send("Hi"));
ASSERT_NO_THROW(s.client.send(zmq::message_t{"Hi"}));
}
// Wait for all servers to receive a message