
gdb was happy with what we had, but libgcc and libunwind weren't. libgcc is happy with the kernel's restorer (because of the extra nop), though libunwind looks like it's going to need code changes regardless. We could make our restorer more like the kernel's one, but why bother when we can just let the kernel supply the canonical one? Bug: 17436734 Change-Id: I330fa5e68f23b1cf8133aa552896657b0b873ed3
Description
No description provided
Languages
C
68.1%
Assembly
16.2%
C++
13.4%
Makefile
1.1%
Python
0.9%
Other
0.2%